Non-transecting bulbar urethroplasty is favored over transecting techniques.

World J Urol

Eastern Virginia Medical School, Devine-Jordan Center for Reconstructive Surgery and Pelvic Health, 225 Clearfield Ave, Virginia Beach, VA, 23462, USA.

Published: December 2020

Purpose: To present current evidence supporting the vessel sparing technique to reconstruct bulbar urethral strictures via primary anastomosis.

Methods: English literature review of presented series of transecting and non-transecting bulbar urethroplasty from 2000 to 2018.

Results: Since its introduction in 2007, vessel-sparing excision and primary anastomosis (VS-EPA) has been utilized in multiple centers across the world. Success rates range from 90 to 98%, comparable to traditional transecting EPA. Complication rates and erectile function outcomes are similar or better in VS-EPA, according to recent publications.

Conclusions: Non-transection excision and primary anastomosis is a well-tolerated, highly successful reconstructive option for short bulbar urethral strictures in appropriately selected patients. Results are comparable with traditional transecting anastomosis and mid-term multinational follow-up has proven efficacy and safety of the technique. Further well-designed multi-institutional studies are necessary to determine superiority to traditional EPA in terms of surgical outcomes and erectile function preservation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02867-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

non-transecting bulbar
8
bulbar urethroplasty
8
bulbar urethral
8
urethral strictures
8
excision primary
8
primary anastomosis
8
comparable traditional
8
traditional transecting
8
erectile function
8
urethroplasty favored
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!