Organisation and governance of infection prevention and control in Australian residential aged care facilities: A national survey.

Infect Dis Health

Department of Nursing Research, Cabrini Institute, Malvern, Victoria, Australia; Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Lifestyle Research Centre, Avondale College of Higher Education, Cooranbong, NSW, Australia.

Published: November 2019

AI Article Synopsis

  • Individuals in residential and aged care facilities are at increased risk for healthcare-associated infections due to factors like age, immunity issues, and existing health conditions, as highlighted by a recent Australian Royal Commission.
  • A study of 158 facilities found that while most had documented infection prevention and control (IPC) programs, only about a quarter had dedicated IPC committees, and many lacked qualified IPC professionals.
  • To enhance the quality of care and reduce HAIs, there is a need for better organization and structured strategies in infection control in these facilities.

Article Abstract

Background: Individuals in residential and aged care facilities (RACFs) are at risk of developing health care-associated infections (HAIs) due to factors such as age-related changes in physiology, immunity, comorbid illness and functional disability. The recent establishment of an Australian Royal Commission into the Quality of Residential and Aged Care Services highlights the challenges of providing care in this sector. This national study identified infection prevention and control (IPC) services, practice and priorities in Australian RACFs.

Methods: A cross-sectional study of 158 Australian RACFs comprising a 42-question survey incorporating five key domains relating to IPC namely governance, education, practice, surveillance, competency and capability was undertaken in 2018.

Results: Of the 131 respondents, the majority 92.4% of respondents reported having a documented IPC program, 22.9% (n = 30) operated with a dedicated infection control committee The majority of RACFs reported lacking specialist and qualified experienced IPC professionals (n = 67). The majority of RACFs (90.1%, n = 118) reported the existence of a designated employee with IPC responsibilities. Of these 118 staff members with IPC responsibilities, 42.5% had a qualification in IPC. The reported average funded hours per month for IPC professional or an external provider of IPC activities was 14 (95% CI 9.6-18.9 h).

Conclusion: The overwhelming majority of RACFs deliver IPC services and report doing so in ways that meet the needs of their own specific contexts in the absence of the lack of formal guidelines when compared to the hospital sector. Quality residential and aged care free from HAIs requires formal structure and organization strategies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2019.06.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

residential aged
16
aged care
16
majority racfs
12
ipc
10
infection prevention
8
prevention control
8
care facilities
8
quality residential
8
ipc services
8
ipc responsibilities
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!