On integrity in immunity during ontogeny or how thymic regulatory T cells work.

The Standard model of T cell recognition asserts that T cell receptor (TCR) specificities are positively and negatively selected during ontogeny in the thymus and that peripheral T cell repertoire has mild self-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) reactivity, known as MHC restriction of foreign antigen. Thus, the TCR must bind both a restrictive molecule (MHC allele) and a peptide reclining in its groove (pMHC ligand) in order to transmit signal into a T cell. The Standard and Cohn's Tritope models suggest contradictory roles for complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) of the TCRs. Here, I discuss both concepts and propose a different solution to ontogenetic mechanism for TCR-MHC-conserved interaction. I suggest that double (CD4 CD8 )-positive (DP) developing thymocytes compete with their αβTCRs for binding to self-pMHC on cortical thymic epithelial cells (cTECs) that present a selected set of tissue-restricted antigens. The competition between DPs involves TCR editing and secondary rearrangements, similar to germinal-centre B cell somatic hypermutation. These processes would generate cells with higher TCR affinity for self-pMHC, facilitating sufficiently long binding to cTECs to become thymic T regulatory cells (tTregs). Furthermore, CD4 Foxp3 tTregs can be generated by mTECs via Aire-dependent and Aire-independent pathways, and additionally on thymic bone marrow-derived APCs including thymic Aire-expressing B cells. Thymic Tregs differ from the induced peripheral Tregs, which comprise the negative feedback loop to restrain immune responses. The implication of thymocytes' competition for the highest binding to self-pMHC is the co-evolution of species-specific αβTCR V regions with MHC alleles.