A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Conjunctival Redness Response to Corneal Stimulation. | LitMetric

Conjunctival Redness Response to Corneal Stimulation.

Optom Vis Sci

School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Published: July 2019

Significance: The conjunctiva is an integral component of the ocular surface, and its vasculature forms a terminal vascular bed of the human internal carotid artery. No research on the response of conjunctival vasculature to ocular surface stimulation exists; however, it is essential to understand the local physiological and pathological responses to such a stimulus.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to characterize the ocular redness levels in healthy participants after the application of noxious corneal stimulation.

Methods: A computerized Belmonte pneumatic esthesiometer was used to determine detection thresholds (using ascending method of limits) and to randomly deliver mechanical and chemical stimuli from levels of detection threshold to twice the threshold in 50% steps to the central cornea of 15 healthy subjects. For each suprathreshold stimulus, a spectrophotometer was used to measure ipsilateral and contralateral conjunctival redness before and after delivery of the corneal stimulus. Redness between the stimulated and unstimulated eyes was analyzed using dependent t tests. The effects of stimulus intensity and modality on conjunctival redness were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Tukey honestly significant difference tests were used for all post hoc analyses. P ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: In mechanical and chemical stimulation experiments, the stimulated eye became redder than the unstimulated eye (all t tests, P > .05). On average, redness increased from baseline as the corneal stimulus intensity increased with corneal stimulation (ANOVA, P < .05). Chemical stimulation produced greater conjunctival redness than did mechanical stimulation at all stimulation levels (ANOVA, P < .05; all Tukey honestly significant difference tests, P < .05).

Conclusions: Stimulation of the central cornea by noxious mechanical and chemical stimuli evokes a dose-dependent autonomic conjunctival redness response. Chemical stimulation of the cornea seems to evoke a greater response compared with mechanical stimulation. This study serves as a basis for the characterization of the local stimulus-response neural circuitry relating nociceptive ocular surface stimuli to autonomic responses.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001398DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

conjunctival redness
20
ocular surface
12
mechanical chemical
12
chemical stimulation
12
stimulation
10
redness response
8
corneal stimulation
8
chemical stimuli
8
central cornea
8
corneal stimulus
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!