AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess how adjusting the challenge-skill balance affects the rehabilitation process for patients with various diseases.
  • Participants (72 clients) were split into two groups: one receiving tailored occupational therapy and the other receiving standard therapy, with evaluations made three months post-discharge.
  • Results showed significant improvements in subjective quality of life and health-related quality of life for the experimental group compared to the control group, suggesting that this approach may enhance recovery outcomes.

Article Abstract

Objective: To verify the effect of adjusting the challenge-skill balance with respect to rehabilitation process.

Design: A single-blind, two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Recovery rehabilitation unit of Harue Hospital, Japan.

Subjects: The trial included 72 clients (mean (SD): age, 74.64 (9.51) years; Functional Independence Measure score, 98.26 (15.27)) with cerebral or spinal disease or musculoskeletal disease.

Interventions: Clients were randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group, who received occupational therapy with adjustment of the challenge-skill balance, and the control group who received conventional occupational therapy. Time from admission to discharge was considered the implementation period; the final evaluation was conducted at three months after discharge.

Main Measures: The primary outcome was subjective quality of life (Ikigai-9). Secondary outcomes were the health-related quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimensions, Five Levels (EQ-5D-5L)), the Flow State Scale for Occupational Tasks, and the Functional Independence Measure. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using total cost and quality-adjusted life-year based on the EQ-5D-5L.

Results: Significant differences were observed between the experimental and control groups with respect to the Ikigai-9 score ( = 0.008) and EQ-5D-5L ( = 0.038), and the effect sizes were 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27-1.24) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.14-1.10), respectively. No significant between-group differences in other outcomes were observed, for example, the Functional Independence Measure score improved in both experimental and control groups (119.80 (5.50) and 118.84 (6.97), respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was US$5518.38.

Conclusions: may be a useful approach to improve the participant's subjective quality of life in the rehabilitation process.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6787762PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215519858713DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

quality life
16
subjective quality
12
occupational therapy
12
challenge-skill balance
12
functional independence
12
independence measure
12
adjusting challenge-skill
8
randomized controlled
8
measure score
8
group received
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!