Background: A key component of Maintenance of Certification (MOC) for family and internal medicine physicians is the requirement to pass a periodic examination of medical knowledge. Little is known about the effects of preparing for MOC exams on knowledge and practice.
Objective: To understand how MOC exam preparation can affect knowledge and practice.
Design: Qualitative, semi-structured interviews, 45-60 min each, conducted by telephone at participants' convenience.
Participants: A total of 80 primary care physicians from the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) and the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) who had recently taken an MOC exam; the sample purposefully selected to represent diversity of experiences with MOC exams and range of opinions about MOC, as well as diversity of participant backgrounds-gender, practice type, etc. APPROACH: Close analysis of physicians' accounts of what they learned when preparing for an MOC exam and how this knowledge affected their practice.
Results: Sixty-seven of 80 physicians stated they gained knowledge relevant to their practice. Sixty-three gave concrete examples of how this affected their practice, including direct changes to patient care (e.g., improved diagnosis or prescribing and reduced unnecessary testing) or less direct changes (e.g., improved ability to co-manage with other providers or communicate with patients). Physicians also described sharing what they learned with others, including peers and trainees.
Limitations: Interviews could have been affected by recall and/or social desirability bias, as well as researchers' role as board staff. Although we followed a recruitment protocol designed to mitigate recruitment acceptance bias, our findings may not be generalizable to wider groups of physicians.
Conclusions: Most physicians from two primary care specialties interviewed reported ways in which studying for an MOC exam resulted in acquiring knowledge that was both relevant and beneficial to their patient care.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6712099 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05118-z | DOI Listing |
Adv Med Educ Pract
June 2024
Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
An ongoing challenge among healthcare certifying organizations is identifying an effective manner of evaluating a physician's competency. The medical field is constantly changing, with new technology, research and pharmacology available, and physicians must be kept up to date in order to properly care for their patients. Maintenance of certification and specifically, recertification exams, are used to verify that a high standard of care is consistently met across all medical specialties.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Shoulder Elbow Surg
September 2024
Baylor College of Medicine, Joseph Barnhart Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Houston, TX, USA.
Background: While multiple studies have tested the ability of large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, to pass standardized medical exams at different levels of training, LLMs have never been tested on surgical sub-specialty examinations, such as the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Maintenance of Certification (MOC). The purpose of this study was to compare results of ChatGPT 3.5, GPT-4, and fellowship-trained surgeons on the 2023 ASES MOC self-assessment exam.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMedEdPORTAL
August 2022
Professor of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine.
Introduction: Many older adults live in a community-based residential geriatric model of care (MOC; e.g., senior apartments, long-term care nursing facilities).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Geriatr Soc
December 2021
American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Background: Older patients are often prescribed potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) given their age. We measured the association between a physician's general knowledge and their PIM prescribing.
Methods: Using a 2013-2017 cross-sectional design, we related a general internist's knowledge (n = 8196) to their prescribing of PIMs to fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries, age ≥ 66 years with part D coverage, which they saw in the outpatient setting the year after their exam (n = 875,132).
BMJ Open
April 2021
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Objective: Diagnostic error is a key healthcare concern and can result in substantial morbidity and mortality. Yet no study has investigated the relationship between adverse outcomes resulting from diagnostic errors and one potentially large contributor to these errors: deficiencies in diagnostic knowledge. Our objective was to measure that associations between diagnostic knowledge and adverse outcomes after visits to primary care physicians that were at risk for diagnostic errors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!