Aims: In the absence of randomised data, we aimed to compare the transapical ACURATE and transfemoral ACURATE neo with the SAPIEN 3 prosthesis using propensity matching.
Methods And Results: From 2012 to 2016, 1,306 patients at three German centres received either the ACURATE/ACURATE neo prosthesis (n=591) or the SAPIEN 3 prosthesis (n=715). Through nearest neighbour matching with exact allocation for access route and centre, pairs of 329 patients (250 transfemoral, 79 transapical) per group were determined. Patients were 81 years old on average and had a logistic EuroSCORE I of 19%. Predilatation and post-dilatation were more frequent in the ACURATE group (97.6% versus 52.1%, p<0.001 for predilatation and 40.4% versus 11.6%, p<0.001 for post-dilatation), but rapid pacing for implantation was used less frequently (37.1% versus 98.2%, p<0.001). More-than-mild aortic regurgitation at postoperative echocardiography was 12.0% for the ACURATE group and 3.1% for the SAPIEN group, p≤0.001). More-than-mild aortic regurgitation in the ACURATE group differed amongst the centres with 6.0% (3/50) in centre A, 34.1% (29/85) in centre B and 3.4% (6/181) in centre C. Patients in the ACURATE group less frequently had pacemaker implantation compared to the SAPIEN 3 group (11.9% versus 18.5%, p=0.020), 30-day mortality was 4.6% versus 2.1%, respectively, p=0.134, and one-year survival was 83.1% (95% CI: 77.6-87.4) versus 88.8% (95% CI: 84.0-92.2).
Conclusions: In this propensity score analysis, patients treated with the transapical ACURATE or transfemoral ACURATE neo prosthesis less frequently had pacemakers at 30 days but had more aortic regurgitation and lower one-year survival.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01120 | DOI Listing |
Ups J Med Sci
December 2024
York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, UK.
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has shown similar or improved clinical outcomes compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at low risk for surgical mortality. This cost-utility analysis compared TAVI with SAPIEN 3 versus SAVR in symptomatic severe aortic stenosis patients at low risk of surgical mortality from the perspective of the Swedish healthcare system.
Methods: A published, two-stage, Markov-based cost-utility model that captured clinical outcomes from the (SWEDEHEART) registry (2018-2020) was adapted from the perspective of the Swedish healthcare system using local general population mortality, utility and costs data.
EuroIntervention
December 2024
Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Background: No data compare newer-generation transcatheter heart valves (THVs) in terms of next-day discharge (NDD) following transfemoral (TF) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
Aims: We aimed to evaluate the safety of NDD in unselected patients who received ACURATE (neo/neo2), Evolut (PRO/PRO+/FX) and the SAPIEN (3/Ultra) THVs.
Methods: This multicentre registry included patients who underwent TF-TAVI without a preprocedural permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) and were discharged the next day without a new PPI.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv
December 2024
Department of Cardiology, St. Francis Hospital and Heart Center, Roslyn, NY (A.H.D., S.M., L.H., W.C., M.H., A.B., G.P., N.R., D.J.C., J.M.K.).
Circ Cardiovasc Interv
December 2024
Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH (G.W.R., R.P., A.K., S.R.K.).
EuroIntervention
November 2024
Cardiovascular Translational Lab, Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, University of British Columbia and Providence Health Care, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!