This study aimed to determine the difficulty level of extracted teeth treated by undergraduate students for pre-clinical endodontic training. Two independent observers assessed a consecutive sample of 1000 periapical radiographs of extracted teeth used in endodontic pre-clinical training. Chi-square test was used to evaluate the adjustment of the distribution, and inter- and intra-examiner agreement were calculated. Minimal, moderate and high difficulty teeth represented 23.1%, 52.1% and 24.8%, respectively. The presence of curvature was the most common grading factor, with 'moderate curvature' reported in 28.7%, and 'extreme curvature' reported in 15.6% of the sample. A difference in the distribution of frequencies was found, favouring the moderate category (P < 0.001). The inter- and intra-examiner strength of agreement were 0.78 and 0.86, respectively. More than 50% of the teeth were categorised as moderate complexity. Almost one-quarter of the total sample, in particular molars, was classified as high complexity, thus unsuitable for undergraduate pre-clinical training.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aej.12355DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pre-clinical training
8
extracted teeth
8
curvature' reported
8
difficulty levels
4
levels extracted
4
extracted human
4
teeth
4
human teeth
4
teeth pre-clinical
4
training endodontics
4

Similar Publications

Our study utilized Life101, a new self-assessment inventory, to assess changes in life skill competencies in students over the first year of medical school. Life101 employs nine scales centered around ubiquitous experiences to assess the relationships between beliefs and outcomes. Although not statistically significant, trends were revealed within the data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Social media has numerous academic and professional benefits and is increasingly valued within healthcare. MedTwitter is an online community of medical professionals on the X platform (formerly Twitter). Despite MedTwitter's numerous benefits and far-reaching users, few medical schools teach students about this resource.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Feedback is an essential part of continuous quality improvement of cases used in medical curricula. This report describes results of qualitative analysis of feedback to elucidate what worked well and what needed improvement from the lens of our pre-clerkship medical students. Complexity, realism, and use of media were themes identified as strengths.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Many medical schools have incorporated clinical reasoning (CR) courses into their pre-clinical curricula to address the quality and safety issue of diagnostic error. It is unknown how students use concepts and practices from pre-clinical CR courses once in clerkships.

Objective: We sought to understand how students utilize CR concepts from a pre-clinical course during clerkships and to identify facilitators and barriers to the use of reasoning concepts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Few medical students are exposed to evidence-based, multidisciplinary oncology care, and few studies in oncology education reflect consolidated pre-clinical curricula. We developed a four-week curriculum, "Frontiers in Neoplasia," for fourth-year medical students, which included didactic lectures, interactive site visits, and team-based simulations of tumor boards and clinical trial design. A mixed methods approach was utilized to investigate the course's impact on students' understanding and interest in oncology, involving pre- and post-course responses to Likert-scale and open-ended questions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!