Mobility after intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation with either a sliding hip screw or a cephalomedullary nail: Sub group analysis of a randomised trial of 1000 patients.

Aims: The aim of this study was to determine if different patient groups have superior mobility regain following intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation with a cephomedullary nail compared to a sliding hip screw (SHS).

Patients And Methods: The present study is a subgroup analysis of patients which were enrolled into a randomized controlled trial which randomized 1000 patients with an intertrochanteric hip fracture to fixation with either a short cephomedullary nail (Targon® PF or PFT) or a SHS. In the present study the two treatment groups were dicotomised on the basis of six variables determined at the time of admission; age (<80; ≥80 years), sex, residence (admitted from own home; institutional care), mobility (mobility score ≥7 [good]; <7 [poor]), mental status (AMTS < 7 [cognitively impaired]; ≥7) and health status (ASA < 3; ≥3). The primary outcome measure was the difference between mobility score pre-fracture and mobility score during the year after hip fracture fixation.

Results: Patients less than 80 years of age, those admitted from their own home, cognitively intact patients and patients who mobilised without assistance pre-fracture, recovered superior mobility when fracture fixation was performed with a nail compared to a SHS. Those patients admitted from institutional care, those with significant cognitive or mobility impairment at the time of the injury did not have any significantly improved benefit in mobility regain with a nail compared to a SHS.

Conclusion: Fixation of an intertrochanteric hip fracture with a cephomedullary nail results in superior recovery of mobility for younger patients who prior to the injury were more mobile, cognitively intact and living at home.