Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: Cardiac late Na current (I) contributes to ventricular action potential duration. Pathological increase in I is arrhythmogenic, and inhibition of I offers protection against ventricular repolarization disturbance. Recently, two I datasets generated by different laboratories that assessed current inhibition by a panel of clinical drugs as a part of the Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) initiative were published. The results revealed a surprising degree of data variability despite of the use of a standardized voltage protocol. This study investigated whether remaining procedural differences related to experimental methods and data analysis associated with these datasets can produce differences in I pharmacology.
Methods: Whole cell voltage clamp recordings were performed on cells expressing Na1.5 α- and β1-subunits to study: 1) the impact of gating modifiers used to augment I (ATX-II vs. veratridine), internal solution composition (with vs. without ATP and GTP), and recording temperature (23 °C vs 37 °C) on stability of I measured across the duration of a patch clamp experiment; 2) mechanisms of each gating modifier on Na channels; and 3) effects of six drugs (lidocaine, mexiletine, chloroquine, ranolazine, ritonavir, and verapamil) on I induced by either gating modifier.
Results: Stability of I is affected by the choice of gating modifier, presence of nucleotides in the internal solution, and recording temperature. ATX-II and veratridine produced different changes in Na channel gating, inducing mechanistically distinct I. Drug potencies on inhibiting I were dependent on the choice of gating modifier and current region where drug effects were measured.
Discussion: I pharmacology can be impacted by all experimental factors examined in this study. The effect of gating modifier and current region used to quantify drug inhibition alone led to 30× difference in half inhibitory concentration (IC) for ritonavir, demonstrating that substantial difference in drug inhibition can be produced. Drug potencies on inhibiting I derived from different patch clamp studies may thus not be generalizable. For I pharmacology to be useful for in silico modeling or interpreting drug-induced changes in cardiac action potentials or ECG, standardizing I experimental procedures including data analysis methods is necessary to minimize data variability.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2019.106605 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!