Evidence that within-dimension features are generally processed coactively.

Atten Percept Psychophys

The Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.

Published: January 2020

In this paper, we examine whether information about an item's category, provided by the same dimension type presented across multiple spatial locations (which we term within-dimension features), is processed independently or pooled into a common representation. We use Systems Factorial Technology (SFT; Townsend & Nozawa, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 321-340, 1995) and fit parametric logical rule-based models to diagnose whether information processing is serial, parallel, or coactive. The present work focuses on expanding the scope of categorization response time (RT) models by synthesizing recent work in perceptual categorization with theories of visual attention. Our results show that for the majority of participants, processing occurs coactively (i.e., is pooled into a single decision process). For the remainder, other processing strategies were found (e.g., parallel processing). This finding provides new insight into decision-making using within-dimension features presented in multiple locations. It also highlights the importance of both featural information and spatial attention in categorization decision-making.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01775-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

within-dimension features
12
presented multiple
8
evidence within-dimension
4
features generally
4
generally processed
4
processed coactively
4
coactively paper
4
paper examine
4
examine item's
4
item's category
4

Similar Publications

Evidence that within-dimension features are generally processed coactively.

Atten Percept Psychophys

January 2020

The Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.

In this paper, we examine whether information about an item's category, provided by the same dimension type presented across multiple spatial locations (which we term within-dimension features), is processed independently or pooled into a common representation. We use Systems Factorial Technology (SFT; Townsend & Nozawa, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 321-340, 1995) and fit parametric logical rule-based models to diagnose whether information processing is serial, parallel, or coactive. The present work focuses on expanding the scope of categorization response time (RT) models by synthesizing recent work in perceptual categorization with theories of visual attention.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Can observers maintain more than 1 attentional set and search for 2 features in parallel? Previous studies that relied on attentional capture by irrelevant distractors to answer this question focused on features from the same dimension and specifically, on color. They showed that 2 separate color templates can guide attention selectively and simultaneously. Here, the authors investigated attentional guidance by 2 features from different dimensions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Using an auditory variant of task switching, we examined the ability to intentionally switch attention in a dichotic-listening task. In our study, participants responded selectively to one of two simultaneously presented auditory number words (spoken by a female and a male, one for each ear) by categorizing its numerical magnitude. The mapping of gender (female vs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Negative effects of item repetition on source memory.

Mem Cognit

August 2012

Department of Psychology, Yale University, 2 Hillhouse Avenue, New Haven, CT 06520-8205, USA.

In the present study, we explored how item repetition affects source memory for new item-feature associations (picture-location or picture-color). We presented line drawings varying numbers of times in Phase 1. In Phase 2, each drawing was presented once with a critical new feature.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study sought to characterize the psychosis phenotype, contrasting cognitive features within traditional diagnosis and psychosis dimension in a family sample containing both schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar I disorder. Seventy-six probands with psychosis [44 probands with schizophrenia, 32 probands with psychotic bipolar I disorder] and 55 first-degree relatives [30 relatives of schizophrenia probands, 25 relatives of bipolar probands] were recruited. Standardized clinical and neuropsychological measures were administered.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!