Using the Wild Bootstrap to Quantify Uncertainty in Mean Apparent Propagator MRI.

Front Neuroinform

Division of Medical Informatics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Published: June 2019

Estimation of uncertainty of MAP-MRI metrics is an important topic, for several reasons. Bootstrap derived uncertainty, such as the standard deviation, provides valuable information, and can be incorporated in MAP-MRI studies to provide more extensive insight. In this paper, the uncertainty of different MAP-MRI metrics was quantified by estimating the empirical distributions using the wild bootstrap. We applied the wild bootstrap to both phantom data and human brain data, and obtain empirical distributions for the MAP-MRI metrics return-to-origin probability (RTOP), non-Gaussianity (NG), and propagator anisotropy (PA). We demonstrated the impact of diffusion acquisition scheme (number of shells and number of measurements per shell) on the uncertainty of MAP-MRI metrics. We demonstrated how the uncertainty of these metrics can be used to improve group analyses, and to compare different preprocessing pipelines. We demonstrated that with uncertainty considered, the results for a group analysis can be different. Bootstrap derived uncertain measures provide additional information to the MAP-MRI derived metrics, and should be incorporated in ongoing and future MAP-MRI studies to provide more extensive insight.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6581745PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2019.00043DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

map-mri metrics
16
wild bootstrap
12
uncertainty map-mri
12
bootstrap derived
8
map-mri studies
8
studies provide
8
provide extensive
8
extensive insight
8
empirical distributions
8
demonstrated uncertainty
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!