Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: The association between matrix metalloproteinase1 (MMP1)-1607 1G>2G polymorphism and lung cancer risk is still inconclusive and inconsistent. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the potential relationship between MMP1-1607 1G>2G polymorphism and lung cancer risk. Methods: The comprehensive searches of the PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, CBM, CNKI, Weipu, and Wanfang databases, published up to Nov 10, 2018. Statistical analyses were performed with Review Manager 5.3 software. Results: A total of 14 relevant studies containing 6068 cases and 5860 controls were included in the study. The results indicated that MMP1-1607 1G>2G polymorphism was significantly associated with increased lung cancer risk under four models: 2G vs. 1G model (pooled OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.05-1.34, P < 0.0001); 2G/2G vs. 1G/1G (pooled OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.09-1.64, P = 0.003); 2G/2G vs. 1G/1G+1G/2G (pooled OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.06-1.49, P < 0.0001); 2G/2G+1G/2G vs. 1G/1G (pooled OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.05-1.40, P = 0.01). Subgroup analyses showed that there was a higher increase in smoking status under three models: 2G/2G vs. 1G/1G (pooled OR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.14-3.77, P = 0.02); 2G/2G vs. 1G/1G+1G/2G (pooled OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.17-2.52, P = 0.006); 2G/2G+1G/2G vs. 1G/1G (pooled OR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.14-3.62, P = 0.02). In addition, subgroup analyses by ethnicity further identified the significant association in Asians. Non-smoking population and ethnicity among Caucasian had no relationship with lung cancer susceptibility in four models. Conclusion: Our study suggested that MMP1-1607 1G>2G polymorphism was a risk factor for developing lung cancer risk.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7021599 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.6.1841 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!