The MB-spot test is extensively applied to specific surface area measurement due to its simplicity compared to the classical BET test. However, the MB-spot test is vulnerable to multiple factors, preventing this newly-prevalent technique from accurately characterising the specific surface area. The inaccuracy of the MB-spot test is discussed here at length, which is urgently needed to avoid mistakes and inconsistencies regarding specific surface area characterization for carbon-based materials.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8nr08780f | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Comment on "Hierarchically porous, ultra-strong reduced graphene oxide-cellulose nanocrystal sponges for exceptional adsorption of water contaminants" by N. Yousefi, K. K. W. Wong, Z. Hosseinidoust, H. O. Sørensen, S. Bruns, Y. Zheng and N. Tufenkji, Nanoscale, 2018, 10, 7171.
Nanoscale
July 2019
College of Marine Ecology and Environment, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, P.R. China.
The MB-spot test is extensively applied to specific surface area measurement due to its simplicity compared to the classical BET test. However, the MB-spot test is vulnerable to multiple factors, preventing this newly-prevalent technique from accurately characterising the specific surface area. The inaccuracy of the MB-spot test is discussed here at length, which is urgently needed to avoid mistakes and inconsistencies regarding specific surface area characterization for carbon-based materials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!