A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comprehensive comparison of pore-scale models for multiphase flow in porous media. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Multiphase flows in porous media are crucial for various natural and industrial processes, driving interest in advanced pore-scale modeling techniques.
  • Recent developments in these models, including lattice Boltzmann and phase-field methods, have outpaced quantitative comparisons between them and real experimental data.
  • The study benchmarks 14 state-of-the-art models using microfluidic experiments, revealing that no single model is best for all scenarios, particularly facing challenges with thin films and corner flow.

Article Abstract

Multiphase flows in porous media are important in many natural and industrial processes. Pore-scale models for multiphase flows have seen rapid development in recent years and are becoming increasingly useful as predictive tools in both academic and industrial applications. However, quantitative comparisons between different pore-scale models, and between these models and experimental data, are lacking. Here, we perform an objective comparison of a variety of state-of-the-art pore-scale models, including lattice Boltzmann, stochastic rotation dynamics, volume-of-fluid, level-set, phase-field, and pore-network models. As the basis for this comparison, we use a dataset from recent microfluidic experiments with precisely controlled pore geometry and wettability conditions, which offers an unprecedented benchmarking opportunity. We compare the results of the 14 participating teams both qualitatively and quantitatively using several standard metrics, such as fractal dimension, finger width, and displacement efficiency. We find that no single method excels across all conditions and that thin films and corner flow present substantial modeling and computational challenges.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6628826PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1901619116DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pore-scale models
16
models multiphase
8
porous media
8
multiphase flows
8
models
6
comprehensive comparison
4
pore-scale
4
comparison pore-scale
4
multiphase flow
4
flow porous
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!