A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

ECG-Derived Respiratory Rate in Atrial Fibrillation. | LitMetric

Objective: The present study addresses the problem of estimating the respiratory rate from the morphological ECG variations in the presence of atrial fibrillatory waves (f-waves). The significance of performing f-wave suppression before respiratory rate estimation is investigated.

Methods: The performance of a novel approach to ECG-derived respiration, named "slope range" (SR) and designed particularly for operation in atrial fibrillation (AF), is compared to that of two well-known methods based on either R-wave angle (RA) or QRS loop rotation angle (LA). A novel rule is proposed for spectral peak selection in respiratory rate estimation. The suppression of f-waves is accomplished using signal- and noise-dependent QRS weighted averaging. The performance evaluation embraces real as well as simulated ECG signals acquired from patients with persistent AF; the estimation error of the respiratory rate is determined for both types of signals.

Results: Using real ECG signals and reference respiratory signals, rate estimation without f-wave suppression resulted in a median error of 0.015 ± 0.021 Hz and 0.019 ± 0.025 Hz for SR and RA, respectively, whereas LA with f-wave suppression resulted in 0.034 ± 0.039 Hz. Using simulated signals, the results also demonstrate that f-wave suppression is superfluous for SR and RA, whereas it is essential for LA.

Conclusion: The results show that SR offers the best performance as well as computational simplicity since f-wave suppression is not needed.

Significance: The respiratory rate can be robustly estimated from the ECG in the presence of AF.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2019.2923587DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

respiratory rate
24
f-wave suppression
20
rate estimation
12
atrial fibrillation
8
ecg signals
8
rate
7
respiratory
6
suppression
6
f-wave
5
ecg-derived respiratory
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!