Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Aim: To evaluate integrated 2-[F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (F-FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in comparison with the standard technique, integrated F-FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT), in preoperative staging of oesophageal or gastroesophageal junctional cancer.
Materials And Methods: In the preoperative staging of 16 patients with oesophageal or gastroesophageal junctional cancer, F-FDG-PET/MRI was performed immediately following the clinically indicated F-FDG-PET/CT. MRI-sequences included T1-weighted fat-water separation (Dixon's technique), T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and gadolinium contrast-enhanced T1-weighted three-dimensional (3D) imaging. PET was performed with F-FDG. Two separate teams of radiologists conducted structured blinded readings of F-FDG-PET/MRI or F-FDG-PET/CT, which were then compared regarding tumour measurements and characteristics as well as assessment of inter-rater agreement (Cohen's kappa) for the clinical tumour, nodal and metastatic (TNM) stage.
Results: There were no medical complications. Comparison of tumour measurements revealed high correlations without significant differences between modalities. The maximum standardised uptake value (SUV) values of the primary tumour with F-FDG-PET/MRI had excellent correlation to those of F-FDG-PET/CT (0.912, Spearman's rho). Inter-rater agreement between the techniques regarding T-stage was only fair (Cohen's kappa, 0.333), arguably owing to relative over-classification of the T-stage using F-FDG-PET/CT. Agreements in the assessment of N- and M-stage were substantial (Cohen's kappa, 0.849 and 0.871 respectively).
Conclusion: Preoperative staging with F-FDG-PET/MRI is safe and promising with the potential to enhance tissue resolution in the area of interest. F-FDG-PET/MRI and F-FDG-PET/CT correlated well for most of the measured values and discrepancies were seen mainly in the assessment of the T-stage. These results facilitate further studies investigating the role of F-FDG-PET/MRI in, e.g., predicting or determining the response to neoadjuvant therapy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2019.05.016 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!