AI Article Synopsis

  • Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technique used to remove early-stage gastrointestinal tumors, primarily in Asia, but its adoption in Western countries is limited, prompting this study on its learning curve in the U.S.
  • A retrospective analysis of 540 ESD cases performed by a single operator revealed that proficiency benchmarks for successful resections were reached after approximately 250 procedures, with en bloc resection rates increasing significantly before plateauing.
  • The study concludes that training for ESD takes longer in the West due to the complexity of lesions tackled early in training, differing from the experiences in Asia.

Article Abstract

Background & Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used in Asia to resect early-stage gastrointestinal neoplasms, but use of ESD in Western countries is limited. We collected data on the learning curve for ESD at a high-volume referral center in the United States to guide development of training programs in the Americas and Europe.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive ESDs performed by a single operator at a high-volume referral center in the United States from 2009 through 2017. ESD was performed in 540 lesions: 449 mucosal (10% esophageal, 13% gastric, 5% duodenal, 62% colonic, and 10% rectal) and 91 submucosal. We estimated case volumes required to achieve accepted proficiency benchmarks (>90% for en bloc resection and >80% for histologic margin-negative (R0) resection) and resection speeds >9cm/hr.

Results: Pathology analysis of mucosal lesions identified 95 carcinomas, 346 premalignant lesions, and 8 others; the rate of en bloc resection increased from 76% in block 1 (50 cases) to a plateau of 98% after block 5 (250 cases). The rate of R0 resection improved from 45% in block 1 to >80% after block 5 (250 cases) and ∼95% after block 8 (400 cases). Based on cumulative sum analysis, approximately 170, 150, and 280 ESDs are required to consistently achieve a resection speed >9cm/hr in esophagus, stomach, and colon, respectively.

Conclusions: In an analysis of ESDs performed at a large referral center in the United States, we found that an untutored, prevalence-based approach allowed operators to achieve all proficiency benchmarks after ∼250 cases. Compared with Asia, ESD requires more time to learn in the West, where the untutored, prevalence-based approach requires resection of challenging lesions, such as colon lesions and previously manipulated lesions, in early stages of training.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.06.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

united states
16
untutored prevalence-based
12
prevalence-based approach
12
referral center
12
center united
12
learning curve
8
endoscopic submucosal
8
submucosal dissection
8
high-volume referral
8
esds performed
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!