AI Article Synopsis

  • Researchers studied how certain parts of the urinary system in men change position after a prostate surgery called radical prostatectomy.
  • They created three new methods to measure these changes using MRI scans and checked if the measurements were reliable.
  • The best method, called the pubococcygeal line (PCL), gave consistent and accurate results for most measurements, while other methods were not as reliable.

Article Abstract

Background: There is a change in the position of the remaining anatomical structures of the lower urinary tract system following radical prostatectomy. The aims of this investigation were to describe three novel methods used to measure the displacement of i) the vesico-urethral junction (VUJ), proximal membranous urethra (PMU) and anorectal junction (ARJ) and ii) the VUJ angle of displacement in men following radical prostatectomy and determine their intra- and interrater reliability.

Methods: Retrospective comparative measurement of twenty pre- and postoperative MRI scans was undertaken by one observer on two separate occasions and on one occasion by another observer. Three standardized midsagittal pelvimetry reference lines were used to describe three X, Y axis measurement systems. The displacement (mm) of the VUJ, PMU and ARJ, and the angle of displacement (degrees) of the VUJ was measured for each of the three methods. Interrater reliability of VUJ, PMU and ARJ displacement and the VUJ angle of displacement measurements was assessed using a two-way mixed-effects agreement intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Test-retest (intrarater) reliability was calculated using a two-way random effects consistency ICC with 95% CI for all displacement measures of the VUJ, PMU and ARJ for one observer between two days.

Results: The pubococcygeal line (PCL) axis measurement system demonstrated good to excellent intrarater and interrater reliability (ICC 95% interval lower bound > 0.75) for the VUJ and PMU displacement and the VUJ angle of displacement measurements. Other measurement systems were less reliable and more variable.

Conclusions: In this sample of 20 Korean patients with median prostate volume 27.5 mL and maximum volume 70 mL, the measurement methodology using the PCL consistently demonstrated good to excellent reliability and the lowest variability for the measurement of the displacement of the VUJ and PMU and the VUJ angle of displacement. The PCL methodology is recommended as the method of choice. Further studies should validate these results in patients with large prostate volumes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6582582PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0472-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

angle displacement
20
vuj pmu
20
vuj angle
16
displacement vuj
16
displacement
12
radical prostatectomy
12
pmu arj
12
icc 95%
12
vuj
11
three novel
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!