. The warm ischemia time (WIT) is key to successful laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the self-retaining barbed suture (SRBS) with a non-SRBS for parenchymal repair during LPN. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was performed up to March 2018. Inclusion criteria for this study were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational comparative studies assessing the SRBS and non-SRBS for parenchymal repair during LPN. Outcomes of interest included WIT, complications, overall operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and change of renal function. One RCT and 7 retrospective studies were identified, which included a total of 461 cases. Compared with the non-SRBS, use of the SRBS for parenchymal repair during LPN was associated with shorter WIT ( < .00001), shorter overall operative time ( < .00001), lower estimated blood loss ( = .02), and better renal function preservation ( = .001). There was no significant difference between the SRBS and non-SRBS with regard to complications ( = .08) and length of hospital stay ( = .25). The SRBS for parenchymal repair during LPN can significantly shorten the WIT and overall operative time, decrease blood loss, and preserve renal function.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1553350619856167DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

parenchymal repair
20
repair lpn
16
srbs non-srbs
12
operative time
12
blood loss
12
renal function
12
self-retaining barbed
8
barbed suture
8
laparoscopic partial
8
partial nephrectomy
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!