In a meta-analysis, we assemble a sample of independent, nonidentically distributed p-values. The Fisher's combination procedure provides a chi-squared test of whether the p-values were sampled from the null uniform distribution. After rejecting the null uniform hypothesis, we are faced with the problem of how to combine the assembled p-values. We first derive a distribution for the p-values. The distribution is parameterized by the standardized mean difference (SMD) and the sample size. It includes the uniform as a special case. The maximum likelihood estimate (MLE) of the SMD can then be obtained from the independent, nonidentically distributed p-values. The MLE can be interpreted as a weighted average of the study-specific estimate of the effect size with a shrinkage. The method is broadly applicable to p-values obtained in the maximum likelihood framework. Simulation studies show that our method can effectively estimate the effect size with as few as 6 p-values in the meta-analyses. We also present a Bayes estimator for SMD and a method to account for publication bias. We demonstrate our methods on several meta-analyses that assess the potential benefits of citicoline for patients with memory disorders or patients recovering from ischemic stroke.
Federated fault diagnosis has attracted increasing attention in industrial cloud-edge collaboration scenarios, where a ubiquitous assumption is that client models have the same architecture. Practically, this assumption cannot always be fulfilled due to requirements for personalized models, thereby resulting in the problem of model heterogeneity. Many approaches dealing with heterogeneous models tend to neglect the issue of representation bias, particularly in the context of non-identically and independently distributed data.
In recent years, Federated Learning (FL) has gained traction as a privacy-centric approach in medical imaging. This study explores the challenges posed by data heterogeneity on FL algorithms, using the COVIDx CXR-3 dataset as a case study. We contrast the performance of the Federated Averaging (FedAvg) algorithm on non-identically and independently distributed (non-IID) data against identically and independently distributed (IID) data.
Majority voting is a simple mathematical function that returns the most frequently occurring value within a given set. As a popular decision fusion technique (DFT), the majority voting function (MVF) finds applications in resolving conflicts, where several independent voters report their opinions on a classification problem. Despite its importance and its various applications in ensemble learning, data crowdsourcing, remote sensing, and data oracles for blockchains, the accuracy of the MVF for the general multiclass classification problem has remained unknown.
Federated learning (FL) has attracted attention as a technology that allows multiple medical institutions to collaborate on AI without disclosing each other's patient data. However, FL has the challenge of being unable to robustly learn when the data of participating clients is non-independently and non-identically distributed (Non-IID). Personalized Federated Learning (PFL), which constructs a personalized model for each client, has been proposed as a solution to this problem.
Machine/deep learning has been widely used for big data analysis in the field of healthcare, but it is still a question to ensure both computation efficiency and data security/confidentiality for the protection of private information. Referring to the data-sharing function of the federated learning (FedL) model, we propose an optimized data-sharing FedL (DSFedL) framework via a data-sharing hub by evaluating an accuracy-privacy loss function. When applied to the derived non-identically and independently distributed (nonIID) datasets simulated from three open-source cardiothoracic databases (i.
