Student engagement in medical education: A mixed-method study on medical students as module co-directors in curriculum development.

Med Teach

Dieter Scheffner Center for Medical Education and Educational Research, Dean's Office of Student Affairs, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin , Germany.

Published: October 2019

Beyond participation in evaluation of teaching, there is sparse research available on more active roles of medical students in curriculum development. We report on a model of student engagement where medical students function as module co-directors, and how this is experienced by faculty and student module directors. Student engage in co-development of their curriculum with a high level of autonomy in organizing their activities. We conducted a mixed-methods, convergent design study based on surveys with faculty and student module co-directors and a student co-director focus group. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively. Qualitative analysis was performed inductively. Quantitatively, the majority of both faculty and student module directors report that the curriculum benefits from the students' work (95 and 94%). Both groups see each other as equal partners (80 and 87%). Qualitatively, this is related to students' competencies such as "bringing in broad and unique knowledge of the curriculum", "giving the students' perspective a voice," and "contributing ideas for improvement". Key strategies and challenges of the student co-module directors are illuminated. Student module co-directors represent a well-accepted practice model for curriculum development. This report may stimulate other faculties to engage their students more actively in medical education.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1623385DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

module co-directors
16
student module
16
medical students
12
curriculum development
12
faculty student
12
student
9
student engagement
8
engagement medical
8
medical education
8
development report
8

Similar Publications

Intervention: Health4Life: a school-based eHealth intervention targeting multiple health behaviour change (MHBC).

Research Question: Does Health4Life impact secondary outcomes of self-reported intentions regarding six lifestyle behaviours in adolescents (alcohol use, tobacco smoking, screentime, physical activity, discretionary beverage consumption, and sleep)?

Methods: We implemented a cluster randomized controlled trial within secondary schools across three Australian states. Schools were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either the Health4Life intervention, which consisted of a six-module, web-based program and accompanying smartphone app, or an active control (standard health education).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Lifestyle risk behaviours are prevalent among adolescents and commonly co-occur, but current intervention approaches tend to focus on single risk behaviours. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the eHealth intervention Health4Life in modifying six key lifestyle risk behaviours (ie, alcohol use, tobacco smoking, recreational screen time, physical inactivity, poor diet, and poor sleep, known as the Big 6) among adolescents.

Methods: We conducted a cluster-randomised controlled trial in secondary schools that had a minimum of 30 year 7 students, in three Australian states.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Beyond participation in evaluation of teaching, there is sparse research available on more active roles of medical students in curriculum development. We report on a model of student engagement where medical students function as module co-directors, and how this is experienced by faculty and student module directors. Student engage in co-development of their curriculum with a high level of autonomy in organizing their activities.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!