AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of using 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) and low-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) together in removing high-grade gliomas (HGGs) compared to using each method alone.
  • Results showed no significant differences in the extent of tumor resection, complication rates, or patient outcomes among the groups using 5-ALA, iMRI, or both techniques during surgeries.
  • Overall, the findings suggest that combining 5-ALA and iMRI for surgical guidance does not provide significant advantages over using them separately in high-grade glioma resections.

Article Abstract

Objective: We sought to assess the impact of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) and low-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) on the extent of resection of high-grade gliomas (HGGs). Results are compared with those obtained when using 5-ALA and iMRI separately.

Methods: We retrospectively included patients with an HGG eligible for gross total resection (GTR) from January 2013 to January 2018. Patients were included according to 5-ALA surgical guidance (5A-group), iMRI (iMRI-group), or both (5A-iMRI-group). Surgical variables were registered, and presurgical and postsurgical radiologic and clinical variables were analyzed. Extent of resection ≥90%, complications, and new permanent neurologic deficit were compared using the chi-squared and analysis of variance tests. Other variables studied were mortality, average hospital stay, surgical time, and Karnofsky Performance Scale status before and after surgery.

Results: Most of the 118 procedures carried out were in men (59.2%). The mean age was 58 years. Sixty patients (50.8%) were operated on using exclusively 5-ALA assistance (5A-group), 19 (16.1%) using iMRI (iMRI-group), and 39 (33%) combining both techniques (5A-IMRI-group). There were no statistically significant differences among 3 groups regarding extent of resection ≥90% (73% 5A, 73.7% iMRI, 71.8% 5A-iMRI, P = 0.94); complication rates (18.3% 5A, 5.3% iMRI, 7.7% 5A-iMRI, P = 0.17); new or worsening of preexisting neurologic deficit at 1-month follow-up (13.3% 5A, 10.5% iMRI, 15.4% 5A-iMRI, P = 0.26); average hospital stay in days (9.5 5A, 6.4 iMRI, 7.6 5A-iMRI, P = 0.18); Karnofsky Performance Scale; nor surgical time in minutes (212.4 5A, 187.9 iMRI, 201.4 5A-iMRI, P = 0.13).

Conclusions: In our experience, combined use of iMRI and 5-ALA does not improve the studied variables when compared with those technologies when used separately, even though a slight tendency of a superior effectiveness is observed when using iMRI individually.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.029DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

5a-imri p =
16
extent resection
12
imri
11
5-aminolevulinic acid
8
magnetic resonance
8
resonance imaging
8
imri imri-group
8
resection ≥90%
8
neurologic deficit
8
average hospital
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!