Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of L. extract (CLE) on periodontal pathogens.

Materials And Methods: Sixty patients were divided into three groups: Group I ( = 20) patients treated with scaling and root planning (SRP) only, Group II ( = 20) patients treated with SRP followed by subgingival irrigation with 1% CLE solution, and Group III ( = 20) patients treated with SRP followed by subgingival irrigation with 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX) solution. The clinical parameters (plaque index [PI], gingival index [GI] scores, probing pocket depths) were recorded at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. The antimicrobial efficacy of 1% CLE and 0.2% CHX solutions against , and were evaluated by disk diffusion method.

Results: There was no significant difference in the mean values of zone of inhibition exhibited by both CLE and CHX solutions. All the groups showed significant improvement in the clinical parameters when compared to baseline values. The improvement in the PI and GI scores in the CLE group was lesser than that in CHX group by the end of the study period.

Conclusion: CLE possess antimicrobial efficacy against the common periodontopathic bacteria. However, further large-scale studies evaluating the substantivity of are required to support its beneficial use in the treatment of periodontal diseases.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6555360PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_295_18DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients treated
12
antimicrobial activity
8
activity extract
8
group patients
8
treated srp
8
srp subgingival
8
subgingival irrigation
8
clinical parameters
8
antimicrobial efficacy
8
chx solutions
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!