Researchers have argued that simultaneous lineups should follow the principle of propitious heterogeneity, based on the idea that if the fillers are too similar to the perpetrator even an eyewitness with a good memory could fail to correctly identify him. A similar prediction can be derived from the diagnostic feature-detection (DFD) hypothesis, such that discriminability will decrease if too few features are present that can distinguish between innocent and guilty suspects. Our first experiment tested these predictions by controlling similarity with artificial faces, and our second experiment utilized a more ecologically valid eyewitness identification paradigm. Our results support propitious heterogeneity and the DFD hypothesis by showing that: 1) as the facial features in lineups become increasingly homogenous, empirical discriminability decreases; and 2) lineups with description-matched fillers generally yield higher empirical discriminability than those with suspect-matched fillers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6565783PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0172-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

propitious heterogeneity
12
diagnostic feature-detection
8
dfd hypothesis
8
empirical discriminability
8
lineup fairness
4
fairness propitious
4
heterogeneity diagnostic
4
feature-detection hypothesis
4
hypothesis researchers
4
researchers argued
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!