AI Article Synopsis

  • High turnover among clinical trial investigators leads to inefficiencies and higher costs in clinical research, but the reasons behind this turnover are not well understood.
  • Using data from the FDA's Bioresearch Monitoring Information System, the study categorized investigators into three types based on their engagement—“one-and-done,” “stop-and-go,” and “stayers.”
  • Over the study period from 1999 to 2015, the overall number of investigators decreased by about one-third, with a notable increase in “one-and-done” investigators, particularly among non-U.S. based ones, indicating concerning trends in researcher participation.

Article Abstract

Background: High turnover rates among clinical trial investigators contribute to inefficiency, instability, and increased costs for the clinical research enterprise; however, factors contributing to investigator turnover have not been well characterized.

Methods: Using information from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Bioresearch Monitoring Information System (BMIS), we examined trends in the overall clinical investigator workforce and within specific "phenotypes" as well as differences by investigator location (U.S.-based vs. non-U.S.-based). We identified unique investigators within the database, stratifying them into one of three "phenotypes": those with one Form FDA1572 submission across the study interval ("one-and-done"); those with two or more submissions but with substantial intervals between trials ("stop-and-go"); and those with two or more submissions and continuous involvement in multiple trials ("stayers").

Results: Of the 172,453 unique investigators who submitted a Form FDA 1572 during the study interval (1999-2015), 85,455 were classified as "one-and-done" investigators; 21,768 as "stop-and-go" investigators; and 65,231 as "stayer" investigators. The total number of investigators declined across the study interval. Among all subgroups, only "one-and-done" investigators showed growth across the study period, largely driven by increases in non-U.S.-based investigators. "Stop-and-go" investigators showed declines for both U.S.-based and non-U.S.-based investigators, as did "stayers," who showed the largest absolute and proportional declines of all subgroups.

Conclusions: From 1999 to 2015, investigators submitting a Form FDA 1572 to the BMIS database declined by approximately one-third and the proportion of investigators involved in only one trial increased, signaling potential adverse trends in the clinical investigator workforce. Strategies for sustaining investigator engagement warrant further exploration.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6536616PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100380DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

investigators
13
trends clinical
12
investigator workforce
12
fda 1572
12
study interval
12
clinical trial
8
1572 bmis
8
bmis database
8
clinical investigator
8
us-based non-us-based
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!