Malone Antegrade Continence Enemas vs. Cecostomy vs. Transanal Irrigation-What Is New and How Do We Counsel Our Patients?

Curr Urol Rep

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3831, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.

Published: June 2019

Purpose Of Review: No gold standard exists for managing neurogenic bowel dysfunction, specifically in individuals with spina bifida. Since the International Children's Continence Society published its consensus document on neurogenic bowel treatment in 2012, an increased focus on why we must manage bowels and how to improve our management has occurred. This review provides updated information for clinicians.

Recent Findings: A surge in research, mostly retrospective, has been conducted on the success and satisfaction of three types of management for neurogenic bowel. All three management techniques have relatively high success rates for fecal continence and satisfaction rates. Selection of which treatment to carry out still is debated among clinicians. Transanal irrigation is a safe and effective management option for neurogenic bowel that does not require surgery. Antegrade enemas can be carried out via cecostomy tube or Malone antegrade continence enema with similar fecal continence outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11934-019-0909-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

neurogenic bowel
16
malone antegrade
8
antegrade continence
8
fecal continence
8
continence
5
continence enemas
4
enemas cecostomy
4
cecostomy transanal
4
transanal irrigation-what
4
irrigation-what counsel
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!