A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Confidential unit exclusion (CUE): Double edged sword for blood transfusion center: A ten-year study on volunteer blood donors in Kohgiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad province, Iran. | LitMetric

Background: Confidential unit exclusion (CUE) is a mechanism developed in the1980s to increase blood safety by allowing donors to indicate confidentially if they think their blood is not safe for transfusion. While it has been used widely around the world, the efficacy of this strategy is still unclear. The present study evaluated the efficacy of the CUE system at the Blood Transfusion Center of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad Province (KBTC), Iran by comparing the prevalence of transfusion-transmitted infectious (TTIs) in CUE and non-CUE groups.

Methods: This descriptive study used data from all volunteer blood donors over a ten-year period. Donors were classified in two groups: CUE and non-CUE. Screening tests were performed for hepatitis B surface antigens (HBs-Ag), hepatitis C virus antibody (HCV-Ab), and Human immunodeficiency virus antibody (HIV-Ab) and any repeatedly reactive results were confirmed by standard methods. Significant differences were determined by Chi test. The sensitivity, specificity and PPV of the CUE system were also calculated.

Results: In the present study, the non-CUE and CUE groups consisted of 98.94% and 1.06% of volunteer blood donors, respectively. First-time donors selected the CUE option more often than repeated and regular donors. The prevalence of TTIs was significantly higher in the CUE group and CUE sensitivity, specificity, and PPV were 5.5%, 98.95%, and 0.96%, respectively.

Conclusion: We recommend the CUE system be pursued for further enhancement of blood safety. However, further studies are needed to establish the overall usefulness of this procedure throughout the whole country.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tracli.2019.05.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

volunteer blood
12
blood donors
12
cue system
12
cue
11
confidential unit
8
unit exclusion
8
exclusion cue
8
blood
8
blood transfusion
8
transfusion center
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!