AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focuses on measuring the value of a quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and value of a statistical injury (VSI) using an improved method called the original chained approach (CA), aiming to overcome previous issues of scale insensitivity in willingness to pay (WTP) estimates.
  • Data collected from 800 individuals in Sweden indicated that the value of a QALY remained relatively constant at around €300,000, regardless of the magnitude of health gains, suggesting that this method can provide valid and consistent estimates.
  • The results support advocating for a higher threshold value for a QALY than what current health technology assessment agencies typically use, potentially influencing future health economics policies.

Article Abstract

The value of a quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and the value of a statistical injury (VSI) are important measures within health economics and transport economics. Several studies have, therefore, estimated people's willingness to pay (WTP) for these estimates, but most results show scale insensitivity. The 'original' chained approach (CA) is a method developed to mitigate this problem by combining the contingent valuation (CV) with standard gamble (SG). In contrast to the version of the CA applied by the previous research of the WTP for a QALY, the original version allows the value of major health gains to be estimated without having the respondents express their WTP directly. The objective of this study was to estimate the value of a QALY and VSI in the context of non-fatal road traffic accidents using the original CA to test if the approach, applied to a wide range of health gains, is able to derive valid estimates and a constant value of a QALY which the previous research has not been able to show. Data were collected from a total of 800 individuals in the Swedish adult general population using two web-based questionnaires. The values of a QALY based on trimmed estimates were close to constant at €300,000 irrespective of the size of the QALY gain. The study shows that the original CA method may be a valid method to estimate the value of a QALY and VSI for major health losses. It also supports the use of a higher threshold value for a QALY than that which is currently applied by several health technology assessment agencies in different countries.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01077-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

qaly vsi
12
qaly
9
chained approach
8
major health
8
health gains
8
estimate qaly
8
health
5
vsi estimated
4
estimated chained
4
approach quality-adjusted
4

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study focuses on measuring the value of a quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and value of a statistical injury (VSI) using an improved method called the original chained approach (CA), aiming to overcome previous issues of scale insensitivity in willingness to pay (WTP) estimates.
  • Data collected from 800 individuals in Sweden indicated that the value of a QALY remained relatively constant at around €300,000, regardless of the magnitude of health gains, suggesting that this method can provide valid and consistent estimates.
  • The results support advocating for a higher threshold value for a QALY than what current health technology assessment agencies typically use, potentially influencing future health economics policies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!