Are public meetings effective platforms for gathering environmental management preferences that most local stakeholders share?

J Environ Manage

USDA Forest Service, Region 1, Building 26 Fort Missoula Road, Missoula, MT, 59801, United States. Electronic address:

Published: September 2019

This analysis tests the theory of the collective action problem by comparing data collected from public meetings with data collected through a random sample of households, to better understand how representative preferences expressed during public meetings are of local stakeholders within a defined social area of influence. While previous studies have focused on the lack of representative participation at public meetings, this work moves beyond the concepts of who comes to the table and why and instead, explores the way that a public engagement process, may or may not provide planners with a representative understanding of local stakeholder preferences. The findings suggest that even when starting with a comprehensive stakeholder analysis, creating space for facilitated dialogue, and carefully curating discussions to focus on shared preferences, public meetings - though highly valuable as a tool for engagement - may not be effective platforms for gathering a comprehensive understanding of the land management preferences that most local stakeholders share.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.060DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

public meetings
20
local stakeholders
12
effective platforms
8
platforms gathering
8
management preferences
8
preferences local
8
data collected
8
public
6
preferences
5
meetings effective
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!