Forty-six subjects (44 HIV antibody-positive) with some degree of immune deficiency (at least TH/TS ratio below 1) were randomly distributed into 4 treatment groups. Each group was assigned to 1 of 4 products to be used exclusively for a 1-year period: 1 concentrate was of intermediate purity and not heat-treated, and 3 were heat-treated in order to inactivate HIV, 2 of them being of higher purity. At 4-6-month intervals, check-ups, including as markers clinical examination, platelet, lymphocyte and T cell subset counts, IgG levels and delayed hypersensitivity test, were carried out. At entry as well as at the end of the study, groups were not statistically distinguishable. No intra- nor inter-group differences were demonstrable for any of the markers. In contrast, using a scoring system for each marker and the results of check-up at entry as reference, significant differences between groups appeared on subsequent check-ups. Patients receiving intermediate-purity factor VIII, whether heat-treated or not, were mostly steady, while groups receiving heat-treated concentrates of a higher purity significantly worsened. This surprising outcome was no related to differences in anti-HIV titers or specificities. From this study, the potential long-term predictive value of this scoring system could not be established.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1423-0410.1987.tb04911.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

factor viii
8
higher purity
8
scoring system
8
role hiv
4
hiv infectivity
4
infectivity composition
4
composition factor
4
viii concentrates
4
concentrates immunity
4
immunity haemophiliacs
4

Similar Publications

Background: Acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is an acquired bleeding disorder resulting from autoantibodies against Factor VIII (FVIII). Previous studies have reported differences in FVIII inhibitor kinetics (type I or type II) in AHA compared to severe haemophilia A.

Aim: To characterise inhibitor kinetics in AHA and evaluate the proportions displaying type I, II or indeterminate kinetics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Prophylaxis with recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) products is the gold-standard treatment for hemophilia A. However, interindividual differences affect the half-life and clearance of rFVIII products. The myPKFiT is a web-based medical-device software program for population pharmacokinetic (PK) simulation of FVIII products to guide accurate FVIII doses and dosing intervals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: A high level of plasma coagulation factor (F)VIII is an established and likely causal risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Procoagulant phospholipids (PPLs) facilitate FVIII activity in coagulation.

Objectives: To assess the association between plasma levels of FVIII and risk of future VTE according to PPL clotting time (PPL), an inverse surrogate measure of plasma PPL activity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Intermediate-dose immune tolerance induction outperforms with faster success, less bleeding, and no added cost in comparison with low dose: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Res Pract Thromb Haemost

January 2025

Hemophilia Comprehensive Care Center, Hematology Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, National Key Discipline of Pediatrics (Capital Medical University), Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.

Background: Low-dose (LD) or intermediate-dose (MD) immune tolerance induction (ITI) is effective in children with severe hemophilia A (SHA) with high-titer inhibitors (HTIs) and is attractive in countries with economic constraints. However, high-quality evidence of their use is lacking.

Objectives: This was a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy, safety, and medication cost between LD-ITI and MD-ITI for SHA-HTI children.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Congenital hemophilia A (HA) disease severity has traditionally been categorized according to intrinsic factor (F)VIII levels, with <1% of normal indicating severe HA, 1% to 5% moderate HA, and 6% to 40% mild HA. However, mounting evidence illustrates considerable variability in bleeding phenotype regardless of FVIII level. Despite treatment advances, people with moderate or mild HA may be neglected, as treatment guidelines and established norms focus on FVIII levels, and many clinical trials do not include people with FVIII > 1%.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!