AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of breast MRI and molecular breast imaging (MBI) in assessing the size of invasive breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and evaluate their accuracy against pathological findings.
  • It involved women with invasive breast cancer, measuring tumor size before and after NAC through both imaging methods, and found that the results from MRI and MBI were closely aligned in many cases.
  • Although both modalities showed similar abilities in determining disease size, neither was fully accurate in detecting residual disease post-NAC, indicating a need for additional tissue diagnosis to confirm findings.

Article Abstract

The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare the size of invasive breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) at breast MRI and molecular breast imaging (MBI) and to assess the accuracy of post-NAC MBI and MRI relative to pathologic analysis. Women with invasive breast cancer greater than or equal to 1.5 cm were enrolled to compare the longest dimension before and after NAC at MRI and MBI. MBI was performed on a dual-detector cadmium zinc telluride system after administration of 6.5 mCi (240 MBq) Tc-sestamibi. The accuracy of MRI and MBI in assessing residual disease (invasive disease or ductal carcinoma in situ) was determined relative to pathologic examination. The longest dimension at MRI was within 1.0 cm of that at MBI in 72.3% of cases before NAC and 70.1% of cases after NAC. The difference between the longest dimension at imaging after NAC and pathologic tumor size was within 1 cm for 58.7% of breast MRI cases and 59.6% of MBI cases. Ninety patients underwent both MRI and MBI after NAC. In the 56 patients with invasive residual disease, 10 (17.9%) cases were negative at MRI and 23 (41.1%) cases were negative at MBI. In the 34 patients with breast pathologic complete response, there was enhancement in 10 cases (29.4%) at MRI and uptake in six cases (17.6%) at MBI. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value after NAC were 82.8%, 69.4%, 81.4%, and 71.4%, respectively, for MRI and 58.9%, 82.4%, 84.6%, and 54.9%, respectively, for MBI. Breast MRI and MBI showed similar disease extent before NAC. MBI may be an alternative to breast MRI in patients with a contraindication to breast MRI. Neither modality showed sufficient accuracy after NAC in predicting breast pathologic complete response to obviate tissue diagnosis to assess for residual invasive disease. Defining the extent of residual disease compared with pathologic evaluation was also limited after NAC for both breast MRI and MBI.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18.20628DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast mri
28
mri mbi
24
mri
15
breast
14
mbi
14
invasive breast
12
breast cancer
12
longest dimension
12
residual disease
12
nac
10

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!