A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Dacryoendoscopy. | LitMetric

A Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Dacryoendoscopy.

Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg

Govindram Seksaria Institute of Dacryology, L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.

Published: January 2020

Purpose: To provide a systematic review of the literature on diagnostic and therapeutic indications, techniques, utility, and complications of dacryoendoscopy (DEN).

Methods: The authors performed a PubMed search of articles published in English/German/Japanese/Chinese on DEN. Data captured include evolution and techniques, diagnostic utility, therapeutic interventions, outcomes, and limitations. Specific emphasis was laid on addressing the current practice patterns and existing lacunae.

Results: Diagnostic DEN has enabled the exact localization and differentiation of mucosal edema, stenosis, strictures, and obstructions throughout the lacrimal drainage system (LDS). Guided expansion of the stenosis, laser dacryoplasty (LDP) for strictures and microdrill removal of dacryoliths (microdrill dacryoplasty [MDP]) are some of the therapeutic uses of DEN. Successful outcomes of up to 60%-70% were achieved with stenosis anywhere along the LDS with a restenosis rate of 20%. Longer segment of stenosis (>2 mm), presence of enlarged lacrimal sac, history of dacryocystitis, postsaccal stenosis, and complete obstruction were associated with poorer outcomes. Microendoscopic procedures like LDP or MDP achieve canalicular and NLD recanalization with optimal results. DEN guided-probing demonstrated high success rates in cases with an earlier failed probing. Available dacryoendoscopes allow high-quality image capture (15,000 pixels) with multiple ports for additional instrumentation and irrigation.

Conclusions: Dacryoendoscopic examination of canaliculus and nasolacrimal duct plays a significant role in the diagnosis and management of lacrimal disorders. Further improvements in microendoscopic techniques and instrumentation will expand its clinical usage and give impetus to minimally invasive lacrimal surgeries.Dacryoendoscopy examinations are increasingly playing a significant role in the diagnosis and therapies of lacrimal drainage disorders.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000001404DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diagnostic therapeutic
8
lacrimal drainage
8
role diagnosis
8
stenosis
5
lacrimal
5
review diagnostic
4
therapeutic
4
therapeutic dacryoendoscopy
4
dacryoendoscopy purpose
4
purpose provide
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!