Culture (behaviour based on socially transmitted information) is present in diverse animal species, yet how it interacts with genetic evolution remains largely unexplored. Here, we review the evidence for gene-culture coevolution in animals, especially birds, cetaceans and primates. We describe how culture can relax or intensify selection under different circumstances, create new selection pressures by changing ecology or behaviour, and favour adaptations, including in other species. Finally, we illustrate how, through culturally mediated migration and assortative mating, culture can shape population genetic structure and diversity. This evidence suggests strongly that animal culture plays an important evolutionary role, and we encourage explicit analyses of gene-culture coevolution in nature.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6546714 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10293-y | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
A gene-culture co-evolutionary perspective on the puzzle of human twinship.
Evol Hum Sci
November 2024
Department of Human Behavior, Ecology and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Article Synopsis
- Natural selection typically favors smaller litter sizes to enhance offspring survival rates, with primates mainly favoring single births.
- Humans, despite being the primate with the slowest growth and longest childhood, still have a notable rate of twin births, which raises questions about the evolutionary reasons behind this.
- Current theories suggest twinning is linked to environmental resources, but data show higher twin rates in poorer economies; this study argues that cultural attitudes towards twins and supportive institutions may explain these trends better.
Genes, culture, and scientific racism.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
November 2024
Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Quantitative studies of cultural evolution and gene-culture coevolution (henceforth "CE" and "GCC") emerged in the 1970s, in the aftermath of the "race and intelligence quotient (IQ)" and "human sociobiology" debates, as a counter to extreme hereditarian positions. These studies incorporated cultural transmission and its interaction with genetics in contributing to patterns of human variation. Neither CE nor GCC results were consistent with racist claims of ubiquitous genetic differences between socially defined races.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFA tale of two cultures: How L. Luca Cavalli-Sforza bridged the gap between science and the humanities.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
November 2024
School of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164.
This article retraces the career of geneticist L. Luca Cavalli-Sforza, from his days as a student researcher to his tenure as a Stanford University professor, and beyond. We show how Cavalli-Sforza's untiring curiosity, enthusiasm, and global knowledge led him to make incisive contributions to topics as diverse as bacterial genetics and human evolution, both biological and cultural.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSignatures of selection with cultural interference.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
November 2024
Biodiversity Centre and Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Article Synopsis
- Human culture influences various aspects of life, including health and reproduction, yet our understanding of how cultural traits interact with the human genome is limited.
- Researchers propose rules of cultural transmission that could apply to both humans and nonhuman animals, suggesting these rules help establish stable connections between cultural and genetic traits.
- They also demonstrate that interactions between cultural and genetic traits can affect natural selection, potentially complicating the patterns we see in genetic data and enhancing genetic selection when cultural influences are strong.
Syntax and the brain: language evolution as the missing link(ing theory)?
Front Psychol
October 2024
Department of English, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.
Introduction: This paper provides proof of concept that neurolinguistic research on human language syntax would benefit greatly by expanding its scope to include evolutionary considerations, as well as non-propositional functions of language, including naming/nicknaming and verbal aggression. In particular, an evolutionary approach can help circumvent the so-called granularity problem in studying the processing of syntax in the brain, that is, the apparent mismatch between the abstract postulates of syntax (e.g.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!