In 2012, a new and promising gene manipulation technique, CRISPR-Cas9, was announced that seems likely to be a foundational technique in health care and agriculture. However, patents have been granted. As with other technological developments, there are concerns of social justice regarding inequalities in access. Given the technologies' "foundational" nature and societal impact, it is vital for such concerns to be translated into workable recommendations for policymakers and legislators. Colin Farrelly has proposed a moral justification for the use of patents to speed up the arrival of technology by encouraging innovation and investment. While sympathetic to his argument, this article highlights a number of problems. By examining the role of patents in CRISPR and in two previous foundational technologies, we make some recommendations for realistic and workable guidelines for patenting and licensing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2018.1531160DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

foundational technologies
8
patenting foundational
4
technologies lessons
4
lessons crispr
4
crispr core
4
core biotechnologies
4
biotechnologies 2012
4
2012 promising
4
promising gene
4
gene manipulation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!