Efficient Nondestructive Sampler for Carcasses and Other Surfaces.

J Food Prot

Bureau of Microbial Hazards, Food Directorate, Health Protection Branch, Health Canada, Tunney's Pasture, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L2.

Published: July 1996

Two versions of an electrically powered device (Rotorinser) to sample carcasses or other surfaces in situ for microbiological analysis and several different sampling protocols were evaluated against excision plus stomaching for ability to remove bacteria from pig skin and beef carcass tissue. Both devices sampled circular areas of approximately 14 cm. Ten tissue samples were used for each set of conditions. Rotorinser bacterial removal efficiency was calculated as R/(R + S), where R is the Rotorinser count (CFU cm) and S is the count on stomached excised tissue after rotorinsing. Stomacher efficiencies were calculated as S1/(S1 + S2), where S1 is the first stomacher count of excised tissue and S2 is the count from a second stomaching. Both Rotorinsers were much better than traditional swabs. Rotorinser 1 gave removal efficiencies of 0.79 to 0.88 for beef, and 0.79 to 0.95 for pork. Prewetting surfaces for 5 min improved removal, but mixtures of enzymes did not. Rotorinser 2 applied with NaCl or NaCl-Tween 80 diluent for either 30 or 60 s was significantly better (0.93 and 0.98) than the stomacher (0.86) at removing aerobic mesophilic bacteria from pork skin. The Rotorinser causes negligible tissue damage and can be used on surfaces at any angle.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-59.7.757DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

carcasses surfaces
8
excised tissue
8
rotorinser
6
tissue
5
efficient nondestructive
4
nondestructive sampler
4
sampler carcasses
4
surfaces
4
surfaces versions
4
versions electrically
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!