A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Adaptation of the "Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation" (NOSE©) questionnaire in the German language]. | LitMetric

Objective: The standardized and validated English NOSE© questionnaire is used to assess subjective complaints of nasal obstruction. The aim of our study was to create and validate a German version of the NOSE© questionnaire.

Material And Methods: The original questionnaire was translated into German in multiple steps. The English back translation was sufficiently similar to the original questionnaire. Next, the translated questionnaire was completed twice each by a group of patients with symptoms of nasal obstruction (n = 76) and a group of nose healthy test persons (n = 104). Subsequently, the questionnaire was tested for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity, discriminant validity and sensitivity to change. Additionally, it was examined whether the rhinomanometric results of the patient group correlated with their questionnaire scores.

Results: The created German NOSE questionnaire had high internal consistency with an average result of Cronbach's α ≥ 0.8. The test-retest reliability was also satisfactory with Goodman-Kruskal-γ = 0.826. The discriminant validity showed significant differences between the patient and control group. Furthermore, sensitivity to change was high. The patients' rhinomanometric results before operation did not correlate with the corresponding NOSE questionnaire Scores.

Conclusions: The study showed that the created German Version of the NOSE© questionnaire (NOSE GAV) is a valid method for assessment of subjective nasal obstruction. It can be used throughout German-speaking areas without restriction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0916-8875DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nose© questionnaire
12
nasal obstruction
12
questionnaire
10
german version
8
version nose©
8
original questionnaire
8
questionnaire translated
8
internal consistency
8
test-retest reliability
8
discriminant validity
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!