Background: In patients with acetabular fractures, the reconstructed three-dimensional (3D) model of the contralateral acetabulum could be used as a mirrored template for the anatomical configuration of the affected joint. This has not been validated.

Objective: To investigate whether the right and left acetabula, as reconstructed 3D models, are valid mirrored duplicates that can be used as a reference model for the contralateral side.

Methods: CT scans of twenty patients with unaffected acetabula were used. The symmetry of the generated 3D models was evaluated through: (1) mirroring of the acetabulum; (2) initial rough matching; (3) automatic optimisation of the matching via surface-based matching; (4) calculation of distances between surfaces by evaluating the Euclidean (straight-line) error distance between the closest points between left and right. The percentages of surface points of the left and right acetabulum with a distance smaller than 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm were calculated and evaluated, in relation to Matta's criteria, for acetabular fracture reductions.

Results: The mean distance deviation was less than 0.75 mm in all 40 comparisons. The calculated distances in 90.7% of the surface points of the left and right acetabulum were below the tolerance threshold of 1.0 mm, based on Matta's anatomical reduction criteria, and 98.7% of the surface points scored below Matta's imperfect tolerance threshold of 2.0 mm.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates 3D reconstructed models of healthy left and right acetabula are highly similar and could potentially be used as mirrored duplicates. The next step will be to investigate these results in patients with reduced acetabular fractures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8629799PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01148-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acetabular fractures
12
points left
12
surface points
12
model contralateral
8
left acetabula
8
reconstructed models
8
mirrored duplicates
8
left acetabulum
8
tolerance threshold
8
left
5

Similar Publications

Background Acetabular fractures, a rising concern in developing countries, pose a significant challenge due to their complexity and association with post-operative complications. Often caused by high-energy mechanisms like falls and motor vehicle accidents, these fractures require accurate reduction to prevent long-term issues and the potential need for hip replacement. This study investigates the radiological outcomes of acetabular fracture surgery at six months, focusing on the effectiveness of achieving anatomical reduction using the Matta criteria in a low-and middle-income country (LMIC) setting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective To determine the outcomes of cemented modular bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Methodology This prospective study involved 102 elderly patients with clinically and radiologically confirmed displaced femoral neck fractures and was conducted in the Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Unit-1, Services Hospital, Lahore. Cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty was performed on all patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Salvage arthroplasty for failed proximal femoral fracture fixation is a complex procedure. This involves the removal of the primary failed or broken implant followed by a hip joint replacement procedure. The complications and technical difficulties associated with these surgeries are often difficult to anticipate.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Matta's Arc: Relevant or Not?

J Clin Orthop Trauma

January 2025

Department of Orthopaedics, KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Matta's Roof Arc Angle (RAA) is utilised to evaluate the load-bearing dome in cases of acetabular fractures, assisting clinicians in making informed decisions regarding treatment options through the measurement of angular displacement. This assessment is crucial for the assessment of acetabular coverage and the stability of the femoral head, helping to determine whether surgical intervention or non-operative approaches are more suitable. Nevertheless, the variability of this method underscores the importance of incorporating additional criteria to ensure the best possible clinical outcomes for patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!