Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In speech-in-speech recognition, listeners' performance improves when spatial and linguistic properties of background and target speech differ. However, it is unclear if these benefits interact or whether they persist under reverberant conditions typical of indoor listening. To address these issues, these benefits were tested together in the presence and absence of reverberation. Results demonstrate that, in the anechoic condition, both spatial and linguistic benefits are obtained but they do not constrain each other. Under reverberation, only the spatial benefit was obtained. This demonstrates the critical need to consider reverberation effects in order to fully characterize the challenges of speech-in-speech listening.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.5100898 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!