Aims: Modular dual-mobility constructs reduce the risk of dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, questions about metal ions from the cobalt-chromium (CoCr) liner persist, and are particularly germane to patients being revised for adverse local tissue reactions (ALTR) to metal. We determined the early- to mid-term serum Co and Cr levels after modular dual-mobility components were used in revision and complex primary THAs, and specifically included patients revised for ALTR.

Patients And Methods: Serum Co and Cr levels were measured prospectively in 24 patients with a modular dual-mobility construct and a ceramic femoral head. Patients with CoCr heads or contralateral THAs with CoCr heads were excluded. The mean age was 63 years (35 to 83), with 13 patients (54%) being female. The mean follow-up was four years (2 to 7). Indications for modular dual-mobility were prosthetic joint infection treated with two-stage exchange and subsequent reimplantation (n = 8), ALTR revision (n = 7), complex primary THA (n = 7), recurrent instability (n = 1), and periprosthetic femoral fracture (n = 1). The mean preoperative Co and Cr in patients revised for an ALTR were 29.7 μg/l (2 to 146) and 21.5 μg/l (1 to 113), respectively.

Results: Mean Co and Cr levels were 0.30 μg/l and 0.76 μg/l, respectively, at the most recent follow-up. No patient had a Co level ≥ 1 μg/l. Only one patient had a Cr level ≥ 1 μg/l. That patient's Cr level was 12 μg/l at 57 months after revision THA for ALTR (and decreased ten-fold from a preoperative Cr of 113 μg/l).

Conclusion: At a mean of four years, no patient with a modular dual-mobility construct and ceramic femoral head had elevated Co levels, including seven patients revised specifically for ALTR. While further studies are required, we support the selective use of a modular dual-mobility construct in revision and complex primary THAs for patients at high risk for instability. Cite this article: 2019;101-B(6 Supple B):57-61.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1403.R1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

modular dual-mobility
28
patients revised
16
revision complex
12
complex primary
12
dual-mobility construct
12
patients
9
levels modular
8
total hip
8
serum levels
8
primary thas
8

Similar Publications

Background: Dual mobility (DM) implants in total hip arthroplasty provide excellent range of motion with low dislocation rates. A complication of this design is intraprosthetic dislocation (IPD), where the polyethylene (PE) liner dissociates from the femoral head. In older designs, IPD occurred due to a small head size and late PE wear with head-capture-mechanism failure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to compare the Modular Dual Mobility (MDM) hip system and large femoral heads (LFHs) in revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs), focusing on risks like dislocation and metal-related complications.
  • Researchers analyzed 299 revision THAs and found that the MDM group had a significantly lower rate of re-revision for dislocation (99% survival) compared to the LFH group (91% survival), with increased risks for LFH patients.
  • Overall, THAs utilizing the MDM construct demonstrated a safer profile, particularly in reducing re-revisions related to dislocation and had no reported issues with metallosis or corrosion.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The dual mobility cup (DMC) reduces the dislocation rates in total hip arthroplasty (THA). DMC systems include anatomical (non-modular or monoblock) (ADM) and modular dual mobility (MDM) components (Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ, USA). This review aims to assess differences between these two types of DMC implants concerning dislocation and revision rates, as well as patient-reported outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Dual-mobility bearings are being increasingly utilized in total hip arthroplasty. Contemporary modular designs often feature inner cobalt-chromium liners that are seated in outer titanium acetabular shells. However, mating of these 2 dissimilar metals may lead to complications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A study was conducted on ceramic-on-metal hip replacements originally performed from 2007 to 2009 to assess their long-term outcomes after 5.8 and 10.1 years.
  • The revision rates increased from 3.1% at six years to 8.8% at ten years, with a notable rise in pain scores and decline in overall hip function during that time.
  • The findings revealed significant issues like increased radiolucent lines in X-rays and higher metal ion levels, indicating that the survival rate for these implants dropped to 91.2%, below the recommended threshold, raising concerns for future implant designs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!