Purpose: We investigate whether small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is associated with less ectasia than laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and whether concomitant collagen cross-linking (CXL) is protective in SMILE Xtra and LASIK Xtra.

Methods: Using an established LASIK rabbit ectasia model, we performed -5 diopter (D) LASIK on six eyes and -5 D SMILE on six eyes; five eyes had -5 D LASIK Xtra, five eyes -5 D SMILE Xtra. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography and corneal topography were performed preoperatively and 2, 4, and 6 weeks postoperatively. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) values of postoperative keratometry (K), maximum posterior elevation (MPE) and minimum corneal thickness (CT) were compared to preoperatively and among the surgical groups (paired -test, analysis of variance).

Results: Mean (SD) K values decreased significantly following SMILE, SMILE Xtra, LASIK, and LASIK Xtra. The MPE increased significantly ( < 0.05) following LASIK, SMILE, and SMILE Xtra, but not following LASIK Xtra ( = 0.12). The MPE was less following SMILE than LASIK, but not statistically significant (week 2, 17.73 [5.77] vs. 22.75 [5.05] μm; = 0.13); post-LASIK Xtra MPE was less than that following LASIK (week 2. 13.39 [3.05] vs. 22.75 [5.05] μm; < 0.001). CT decreased significantly in all surgical groups; no differences were detected among the groups.

Conclusions: SMILE may have less potential than LASIK to induce ectasia. LASIK Xtra and SMILE Xtra showed the smallest increase in MPE.

Translational Relevance: Concomitant CXL may be protective following keratorefractive surgery and may reduce further the risk of ectasia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6526961PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.3.21DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

smile xtra
20
lasik xtra
16
lasik
14
smile
12
xtra lasik
12
xtra
10
lasik smile
8
collagen cross-linking
8
cxl protective
8
eyes smile
8

Similar Publications

[Clinical outcomes of SMILE Xtra for myopia correction].

Vestn Oftalmol

November 2024

OOO Oftalmologicheskaya klinika Spektr, Moscow, Russia.

Article Synopsis
  • This study evaluated the outcomes of the SMILE Xtra technique for patients with thin corneas at risk for keratectasia, involving 53 patients with myopia.
  • It found significant improvements in uncorrected visual acuity and stable refractive results over 12 months, with no cases of keratectasia or major complications reported.
  • The initial decrease in central corneal thickness and mild post-operative symptoms resolved within a week, indicating that SMILE Xtra is a viable option for those with thin corneas.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate the changes of the corneal epithelial thickness (ET) profile induced by combined small incision lenticule extraction and accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking (SMILE-xtra) for myopia compared with the standard small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Setting: Nuri Eye Hospital, 61, Dunsan-ro, Seo-gu, Daejeon, 35233, Korea.

Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcome during 24 months follow-up between small incision lenticule extraction combined with cross-linking (SMILE Xtra) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) only. . Ophthalmology Division of San Rossore Medical Center, Pisa, Italy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To study the corneal morphology and biomechanics in cases of small incision lenticule extraction with prophylactic accelerated collagen cross-linking (SMILE Xtra).

Methods: This study was a retrospective study. 28 eyes of 14 patients with moderate-high risk of postoperative ectasia according to the Randleman scoring system underwent SMILE Xtra procedure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To compare the long-term safety, efficacy, predictability, and refractive stability following SMILE versus SMILE combined with accelerated cross-linking (SMILE XTRA), and to specifically study the regression patterns following the two procedures.

Methods: This retrospective study included 54 eyes of SMILE and 54 eyes of SMILE XTRA treated for normal and borderline cases of myopia/myopic astigmatism, respectively, based on certain predefined topographic features and risk factors. Patients in both the groups were matched for age and refractive error.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!