Objective: To assess and compare the performance of triage systems for identifying high and low-urgency patients in the emergency department (ED).

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data Sources: EMBASE, Medline OvidSP, Cochrane central, Web of science and CINAHL databases from 1980 to 2016 with the final update in December 2018.

Eligibility Criteria: Studies that evaluated an emergency medical triage system, assessed validity using any reference standard as proxy for true patient urgency and were written in English. Studies conducted in low(er) income countries, based on case scenarios or involving less than 100 patients were excluded.

Review Methods: Reviewers identified studies, extracted data and assessed the quality of the evidence independently and in duplicate. The Quality Assessment of studies of Diagnostic Accuracy included in Systematic Reviews -2 checklist was used to assess risk of bias. Raw data were extracted to create 2×2 tables and calculate sensitivity and specificity. ED patient volume and casemix severity of illness were investigated as determinants of triage systems' performance.

Results: Sixty-six eligible studies evaluated 33 different triage systems. Comparisons were restricted to the three triage systems that had at least multiple evaluations using the same reference standard (Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale, Emergency Severity Index and Manchester Triage System). Overall, validity of each triage system to identify high and low-urgency patients was moderate to good, but performance was highly variable. In a subgroup analysis, no clear association was found between ED patient volume or casemix severity of illness and triage systems' performance.

Conclusions: Established triage systems show a reasonable validity for the triage of patients at the ED, but performance varies considerably. Important research questions that remain are what determinants influence triage systems' performance and how the performance of existing triage systems can be improved.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6549628PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026471DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

triage systems
24
triage
13
triage system
12
triage systems'
12
performance triage
8
systematic review
8
high low-urgency
8
low-urgency patients
8
studies evaluated
8
reference standard
8

Similar Publications

: Despite recent decades' rapid advances in the management of patients with sepsis and septic shock, global sepsis mortality and post-acute sepsis morbidity rates remain high. Our aim was, therefore, to provide a first overview of sepsis care pathways as well as barriers and supportive conditions for optimal pre-clinical, clinical, and post-acute sepsis care in Germany. : Between May and September 2023, we conducted semi-structured, video-based, one-to-one pilot expert interviews with healthcare professionals representing pre-hospital, clinical, and post-acute care settings.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: Predictors of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients have been extensively studied. However, comparative analyses of predictors for hospitalization versus discharge from the emergency department remain limited. : This retrospective study evaluated predictors of hospitalization among adults (≥18 years) presenting to the emergency department with COVID-19 infection between 1 March 2020 and 15 June 2020.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Outcomes of popliteal artery injuries in a level 1 trauma centre: a 6-year review.

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg

January 2025

Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma Surgery, Charlotte-Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Purpose: To determine modifiable and non-modifiable factors contributing to limb loss in PAI the relevance and accuracy of published scoring systems for PAI within a South African State hospital.

Methodology: Retrospective review of patients (> 18 years) with PAI, presenting to CMJAH trauma unit from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2022.

Results: Sixty-four patient records were analysed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Judicious utilisation of tertiary care facilities through appropriate risk stratification assumes priority, in a raging pandemic, of the nature of delta variant-predominated second wave of COVID-19 pandemic in India. Prioritisation of tertiary care, through a scientifically validated risk score, would maximise recovery without compromising individual safety, but importantly without straining the health system.

Methods: De-identified data of COVID-19 confirmed patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital in South India, between April 1, 2021 and July 31, 2021, corresponding to the peak of COVID-19 second wave, were analysed after segregating into 'survivors' or 'non-survivors' to evaluate the risk factors for COVID-19 mortality at admission and formulate a risk score with easily obtainable but clinically relevant parameters for accurate patient triaging.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Importance: Access to healthcare remains a persistent challenge. Socially disadvantaged populations often encounter barriers to care and may frequently seek out emergency departments (EDs), including for nonurgent medical care.

Objective: The objective of this study is to study the association between nonurgent presentations to pediatric EDs and patients' socioeconomic environment in an urban setting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!