AI Article Synopsis

  • Various brands of filtering facepiece respirators were tested for their effectiveness against bioaerosols, specifically Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli.
  • The study evaluated their filtration efficiency and the microbial recovery rates while considering different airflow velocities and humidity levels.
  • Results showed that while filtration efficiency ranged from 82% to 99%, a significant percentage of bacteria could still survive on the respirator surfaces, highlighting potential health risks for users.

Article Abstract

Many brands of filtering facepiece respirators are used against air pollution, including bioaerosols; however, studies have explored exposure to bioaerosols from the inside surfaces of respirators. We evaluated the filtration efficiencies and microbial recovery rates of commercial filtering facepiece respirators against bioaerosols. Eight filtering facepiece respirators and one surgical mask were selected, all with high market shares in the Republic of Korea and certified by national or international standards. The tested filtering facepiece respirators were installed on the head of a mannequin under various airflow velocity and relative humidity (RH) conditions. The filtration efficiency against Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli bioaerosols, the pressure drop of the filter, and the relative recovery rates for the bacteria were evaluated. The filtration efficiency of each filtering facepiece respirator ranged from 82% to 99%, depending on the filtration grade. The pressure drop was significantly affected by variations in the surrounding RH. The mean relative recovery rates of all filtering facepiece respirators were 14 ± 4.8% and 9 ± 4.7% for S. epidermidis and E. coli, respectively. These results indicate that airborne microorganisms can survive and accumulate on the surfaces of filtering facepiece respirators, which may lead to harmful health outcomes. Our findings will be useful as background information for the development of commercial filtering facepiece respirators while considering their biological properties and reliable guidance to users.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.153DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

filtering facepiece
36
facepiece respirators
32
recovery rates
16
commercial filtering
12
filtering
9
facepiece
9
respirators
9
microbial recovery
8
rates commercial
8
evaluated filtration
8

Similar Publications

Filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) are manufactured in discrete sizes, with some models being limited in relation to accommodating the fit of some sex and race combinations. This study presents the development of a custom-fit respiratory protective device (RPD) which conforms to a user's facial features and flexes and moves with facial movements during use. Our design also integrates a pressure-sensing network, which continuously monitors fit and will alert the user when the fit is compromised.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Developing and overseeing Respiratory Protection Programs (RPPs) is crucial for ensuring effective respirator use among employees. To date, a gap exists in research that focuses on elastomeric half mask respirators (EHMRs) as the primary respirator in health delivery settings which would necessitate additional considerations in RPPs beyond the more common N95 filtering facepiece respirators. This paper presents lessons learned during a one-year impact evaluation with healthcare and first responder settings that received EHMRs from the Strategic National Stockpile in 2021 and 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unlabelled: There is an ongoing trend toward more frequent and multiple crises. While there is a clear need for behaviors to become more sustainable to address the climate crisis, how to achieve this against the backdrop of other crises is unknown. Using a sample of 18,805 participants from the UK, we performed a survey experiment to investigate if communication messages provide a useful tool in nudging intentions toward improved sustainability in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the effects of wearing N95 masks compared to loop/surgical masks on healthcare workers during long shifts, focusing on symptoms like fatigue and blood gas levels.
  • It involved a survey and measurements of carbon dioxide and oxygen levels before and after shifts, with 39 subjects participating.
  • Results indicated that those wearing N95 masks reported significantly higher fatigue levels, but no meaningful differences were found in arterial blood gas parameters between the two mask types.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!