AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Girls' lacrosse participation and head injury rates have increased . In response, optional headgear was implemented following the recently developed ASTM International (ASTM) lacrosse headgear performance standards. It remains unknown how lacrosse headgear responds to blunt impacts after use. Our purpose was to compare the peak linear acceleration (PLA) between girls' lacrosse headgear conditions (pristine and used) during blunt impacts. Pristine headgear (n=10) were tested in their original condition and used headgear (n=10) were worn for an entire competitive season. A Cadex Monorail Impactor impacted all headgear following ASTM standards (F1446-15b, F2220-15, and F3137-15) in the required testing locations. A 2 x 7 repeated measures ANOVA compared PLA among headgear conditions and impact locations with a simple effects analysis planned comparison. There was no difference between headgear conditions for PLA (Pristine: 47.12 ± 13.92g; Used: 46.62 ± 14.84g; F = 2.11, > 0.05). A main effect for impact location (F = 983.52, < 0.01), and an interaction effect of condition and impact location (F = 12.79, < 0.01) were observed. All headgear, regardless of condition, met the ASTM performance standard. This suggests that headgear performance may not degrade subsequent to a single season of high school girl's lacrosse.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jab.2018-0457DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

headgear
12
girls' lacrosse
12
lacrosse headgear
12
headgear conditions
12
pristine headgear
8
headgear performance
8
blunt impacts
8
headgear n=10
8
impact location
8
lacrosse
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!