AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to analyze the occurrence of postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) using various antibiotic prophylaxis (ABP) regimens.
  • A total of 426 patients participated in the trial, which tested three ABP approaches: no antibiotics, a single dose, and two doses of ciprofloxacin before and after surgery, with results showing similar SIRS incidence across groups, especially for smaller stones.
  • The findings suggest that for patients with stones of 200 mm or smaller, ABP is not necessary, but for those with larger stones (>200 mm), a single dose of antibiotics is recommended to reduce the risk of SIRS.

Article Abstract

Objective: To study the incidence of postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) following different antibiotic prophylaxis (ABP) regimens in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

Patients And Methods: Single-centre, randomised, controlled trial (August 2014-September 2017) including 426 patients with renal stones with preoperative sterile urine managed by RIRS (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02304822). Different ciprofloxacin-based ABP regimens were used and included a zero dose, single dose (30 min before surgery) or two doses (first dose at 30 min before RIRS and additional dose within 6 h after RIRS). The incidence of SIRS was compared using intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses.

Results: Each group enrolled 142 patients. In the ITT analysis, a zero dose of ABP was statistically similar to the two ABP regimes for the incidence of SIRS (9.9% vs single dose 4.9%, P = 0.112; vs two doses 4.2%, P = 0.062). There were also no relevant differences across groups in the PP analysis; no urosepsis was recorded. In subgroup analysis with stratification by stone area, the three regimens all had a low and similar incidence of SIRS for stones of ≤200 mm in the ITT analysis with a sufficient power value (5.4% vs 6.2% vs 3.6%, P = 0.945 vs single dose and P = 0.553 vs two doses). However, there was a greater chance of SIRS in patients who received no ABP with stones of >200 mm (18% vs single dose 4.3%, P = 0.036; vs two doses 5.5%, P = 0.044). Similar trends were seen in the PP analysis.

Conclusions: For patients with preoperative sterile urine, ABP is not strongly recommended in patients with stones of ≤200 mm , but for stones >200 mm single-dose ABP is still required.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.14832DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

single dose
16
incidence sirs
12
antibiotic prophylaxis
8
retrograde intrarenal
8
intrarenal surgery
8
randomised controlled
8
controlled trial
8
abp regimens
8
preoperative sterile
8
sterile urine
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!