Purpose: To compare the refractive, visual, and aberrometric results with a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens (EDOF IOL) based on alternating positive and negative spherical aberration in the central 3.0 mm optical zone and an aspheric monofocal IOL of the same platform.

Setting: Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Verona, Italy.

Design: Prospective case series.

Methods: Cataract patients free from other ocular disease had bilateral implantation of the EDOF Mini Well IOL or the monofocal Mini IOL. Four to 6 weeks after second-eye surgery, the refraction, visual acuity, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, and photic symptoms were assessed. Wavefront analysis was performed. The primary endpoint of was the amplitude of the dioptric interval for 0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity. The secondary endpoint was an aberration comparison between the two IOLs.

Results: The study comprised two groups of 25 patients each. The corrected distance visual acuity was better with the monofocal IOL by 0.02 logMAR (P = .03). The 0.1 logMAR dioptric interval was 2.0 diopters (D) for the EDOF IOL and 1.0 D for the monofocal IOL (P < .001). The mean CDVA at -2.0 defocus was 0.15 logMAR ± 0.08 (SD) and 0.52 ± 0.14 logMAR, respectively (P < .001). There was no difference in contrast sensitivity or photic symptoms. The optical aberrations at 4.0 mm and 6.0 mm aperture diameters were similar in the two groups.

Conclusion: The EDOF IOL based on spherical aberration provided greater depth of focus than the aspheric monofocal IOL without increasing optical aberrations and with few photic symptoms.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.02.023DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

monofocal iol
12
visual acuity
12
extended depth-of-focus
8
depth-of-focus intraocular
8
intraocular lens
8
spherical aberration
8
edof iol
8
iol monofocal
8
dioptric interval
8
iol
7

Similar Publications

To analyze the refractive accuracy of a novel swept-source optical coherence biometer (SS-OCT), that uses individual refractive indices to measure axial length, in short and long eyes implanted with monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). This retrospective comparative study considered eyes with short axial length (AL) (< 22.5 mm) or long AL (> 26 mm) bilaterally implanted with the Acrysof IQ monofocal IOL.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of a new hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens called Clareon (Alcon) using the mini-monovision technique.

Methods: A single-center, prospective, nonrandomized study was conducted in Tandil (Buenos Aires, Argentina), including patients scheduled for cataract surgery. To achieve mini-monovision, the spherical equivalent was calculated between -0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To measure visual acuity at three different defocus planes in pseudophakic subjects with varying levels of spherical aberration induced by an adaptive optics visual simulator. The study aimed to simulate Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Setting: Private hospital (IMO, Barcelona, Spain).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Toric intraocular lens implantation has been used to correct corneal astigmatism during cataract surgery. The study aimed to compare the visual outcomes between manual vs markerless toric intraocular lens implantation in astigmatic correction.

Methods: The medical records of patients at American Eye Center who underwent phacoemulsification by multiple surgeons with insertion of monofocal or multifocal toric lenses via manual marking and markerless method from 2010-2019 were reviewed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

An intraocular lens (IOL) replaces the natural crystalline lens during cataract surgery, and although the vast majority of implants have simple optics, "advanced technology" IOLs have multifocal and extended depth of focus (EDOF) properties. Optical concepts are evaluated here, with image contrast, focal range, and unwanted visual phenomena being the primary concerns. Visual phenomena with earlier bifocal diffractive lenses led to alternative diffractive designs (trifocals, etc.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!