Effects of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Pulmonary Oxygenation and Biventricular Function during One-Lung Ventilation: A Randomized Crossover Study.

J Clin Med

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea.

Published: May 2019

Although the application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can alter cardiopulmonary physiology during one-lung ventilation (OLV), these changes have not been clearly elucidated. This study assessed the effects of different levels of PEEP on biventricular function, as well as pulmonary oxygenation during OLV. Thirty-six lung cancer patients received one PEEP combination of six sequences, consisting of 0 (PEEP_0), 5 (PEEP_5), and 10 cmHO (PEEP_10), using a crossover design during OLV. The ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to inspired oxygen fraction (P/F ratio), systolic and diastolic echocardiographic parameters were measured at 20 min after the first, second, and third PEEP. P/F ratio at PEEP_5 was significantly higher compared to PEEP_0 ( = 0.014), whereas the P/F ratio at PEEP_10 did not show significant differences compared to PEEP_0 or PEEP_5. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF) and right ventricular fractional area change (RV FAC) at PEEP_10 (EF, < 0.001; FAC, = 0.001) were significantly lower compared to PEEP_0 or PEEP_5. RV E/E' ( = 0.048) and RV myocardial performance index ( < 0.001) at PEEP_10 were significantly higher than those at PEEP_0 or PEEP_5. In conclusion, increasing PEEP to 10 cmHO decreased biventricular function, especially on RV function, with no further improvement on oxygenation compared to PEEP 5 cmHO during OLV.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6571862PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8050740DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peep_0 peep_5
16
biventricular function
12
p/f ratio
12
compared peep_0
12
positive end-expiratory
8
end-expiratory pressure
8
pulmonary oxygenation
8
one-lung ventilation
8
peep cmho
8
peep
6

Similar Publications

Background and objective In general anesthesia, for certain surgical procedures in the prone position, patients often face increased airway pressures, reduced pulmonary and thoracic compliance, and restricted chest expansion, all of which can affect venous return and cardiac output, impacting overall hemodynamic stability. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is used to address these issues by improving lung recruitment and ventilation while reducing stress on lung units. However, different PEEP levels also present risks such as increased parenchymal strain, higher pulmonary vascular resistance, and impaired venous return.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the best strategy to achieve fast and safe extubation.

Methods: This multicenter trial randomized patients with primary respiratory failure and low-to-intermediate risk for extubation failure with planned high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) preventive therapy. It included four groups: (1) conservative screening with ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO) ≥ 150 and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ≤ 8 cmHO plus conservative spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) with pressure support 5 cmHO + PEEP 0 cmHO); (2) screening with ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO) ≥ 150 and PEEP ≤ 8 plus aggressive SBT with pressure support 8 + PEEP 5; (3) aggressive screening with PaO/FiO > 180 and PEEP 10 maintained until the SBT with pressure support 8 + PEEP 5; (4) screening with PaO/FiO > 180 and PEEP 10 maintained until the SBT with pressure support 5 + PEEP 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Rhinoplasty Surgery; Risks and Benefits.

Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

December 2023

Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Amiralmomenin Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) on surgical field bleeding and its respiratory and hemodynamic consequences in rhinoplasty surgeries.

Materials And Methods: This single-blind clinical trial performed in Amir Al-Momenin university Hospital in 2018. Seventy cases of rhinoplasty surgery patients Enrolled and were randomized into two groups; intervention (PEEP = 5) and comparison group (PEEP = 0).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Many RCTs have evaluated the influence of intraoperative tidal volume (tV), PEEP, and driving pressure on the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications, cardiovascular complications, and mortality in adult patients. Our meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between tV, PEEP, and driving pressure and the above-mentioned outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs from inception to May 19, 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Low-level pressure support ventilation (PSV) is most commonly adopted in spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs), and some have proposed setting the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to 0 cmH O in order to shorten the observation time of SBTs. This study aims to investigate the effects of two PSV protocols on the patients' respiratory mechanics.

Material And Method: A prospective randomized self-controlled crossover design was adopted in this study, which involved enrolling 30 difficult-to-wean patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University between July 2019 and September 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!