Association between cannabis laws and opioid prescriptions among privately insured adults in the US.

Prev Med

Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-0177, United States of America; Office of Biostatistics, Preventive Medicine and Community Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-1148, United States of America.

Published: August 2019

AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

We examine the association between opioid prescription patterns in privately insured adults and changes in state cannabis laws among five age groups (18-25, 26-35 36-45, 46-55 and 56-64 years). Using the 2016 Clinformatics Data Mart, a nationwide commercial health insurance database, we performed a cross-sectional analysis of two types of opioid prescribing (>30-day and >90-day prescriptions) among all adults aged 18-64 based on the stringency of cannabis laws. We found a significant interaction between age and cannabis law on opioid prescriptions. Age-stratified multilevel multivariable analyses showed lower opioid prescription rates in the four younger age groups only in states with medical cannabis laws, when considering both >30 day and >90 day opioid use [>30 day adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.56, in 18-25, aOR = 0.67 in 26-35, aOR = 0.67 in 36-45, and aOR = 0.76 in 46-54 years; >90 day aOR = 0.56, in 18-25, aOR = 0.68 in 26-35, aOR = 0.69 in 36-45, and aOR = 0.77 in 46-54 years, P < 0.0001 for all]. This association was not significant in the oldest age group of 55-64 years. There was no significant association between opioid prescriptions and other categories of cannabis laws (recreational use and decriminalization) in any of the age groups studied.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6582995PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.05.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cannabis laws
16
opioid prescriptions
8
privately insured
8
insured adults
8
opioid prescription
8
age groups
8
aor = 056 18-25
8
opioid
6
association cannabis
4
laws
4

Similar Publications

Importance: States have implemented multiple policies likely to influence opioid prescribing; few national general population studies examine those policies' effects on per-capita opioid morphine milligram equivalents (MME) dispensed.

Objective: To examine state policies' effects on opioids per-capita MMEs dispensed at retail pharmacies.

Design: A longitudinal study of associations between MME per capita and implementation of policy interventions at different times across states.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Evidence supporting cannabis substitution along with liberalized cannabis laws have left recovery homes such as sober living houses (SLHs) in a difficult position regarding policies relating to cannabis use among SLH residents. Moreover, there are few studies of cannabis use among SLH residents that can be used to inform cannabis use policies. Here we assess whether cannabis is related to alcohol use among SLH residents.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Given the changes in trends of cannabis use (e.g., product types), this study examined latent classes of young adult use and associations with use-related outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Wider availability of cannabis through medical and recreational legalization (MCL alone and RCL+MCL) has been hypothesized to contribute to reductions in opioid use, misuse, and related harms. We examined whether state adoption of cannabis laws was associated with changes in opioid outcomes overall and stratified by cannabis use.

Methods: Using National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) data from 2015 to 2019, we estimated cannabis law associations with opioid (prescription opioid misuse and/or heroin use) misuse and use disorder.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Impact of medical and recreational cannabis laws on inpatient visits for asthma.

Health Serv Res

December 2024

Department of Economics, College of Business, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

Objective: To examine the impact of medical and recreational cannabis laws on inpatient visits for asthma and by payer-type.

Study Setting And Design: Quasi-experimental difference-in-differences regression analysis was conducted while accounting for variations in cannabis laws implementation timing by states. Inpatient visits for asthma in states with a given type of cannabis law were compared with those in states that did not implement the specific law.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!