A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Use of Petrifilm 3M to Assess Coliform Numbers on Lamb Carcasses. | LitMetric

Use of Petrifilm 3M to Assess Coliform Numbers on Lamb Carcasses.

J Food Prot

Veterinary Public Health Division, Livestock and Meat Authority of Queensland, Locked Mail Bag 6, Emerald Q 4720, Australia.

Published: October 1994

Petrifilm (6410) was used directly on lamb carcasses to enumerate coliforms. Ten sampling locations (sites) on 30 carcasses were sampled at each of four separate meat processing establishments (works). The coliform counts obtained by this technique were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) to select the optimum sampling sites on the carcass and to assess the contamination of the carcass by gut flora at a particular establishment. There was a large variation between sites and between works. In general, works 3 and 4 produced cleaner carcasses than works 2, which in turn was cleaner than works 1. Since works 1, 2 and 4 used conventional dressing techniques and works 3 used the inverted dressing method, the coliform counts found at works 3 and 4 are achievable regardless of dressing technique. The coliform bacteria were most concentrated around the posterior pelvic rim and least prevalent at the carcass extremities. The posterior pelvic rim (sites 3 and 4) had higher (P<0.05) coliform counts than the exterior ventral flank area (sites 5, 6, 7 and 8), which in turn had higher (P<0.05) counts than the proximal hind and proximal fore limbs (sites 1, 2, 9 and 10) across all works. With in-line routine testing it is recommended that the majority of carcasses sampled should give coliform counts of less than 50 colony forming units (CFU)/20 cm for sites 4 and 8.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-57.10.924DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lamb carcasses
8
works
8
coliform counts
8
posterior pelvic
8
pelvic rim
8
petrifilm assess
4
coliform
4
assess coliform
4
coliform numbers
4
numbers lamb
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!