Several previous studies have shown that laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer is a feasible option. However, its safety and efficacy in patients receiving long-term anti-thrombotic therapy (AT) remain unclear. We retrospectively reviewed 364 patients who underwent elective resection for rectal cancer via a laparoscopic approach between 2007 and 2018 in our institute. Patients were classified according to the long-term use of AT. AT was interrupted perioperatively with or without heparin bridging therapy in all anti-thrombotic users. Clinicopathological factors and surgical outcomes were analyzed between patient groups. Thirty-two patients (9%) receiving AT were older and had lower albumin and hemoglobin levels than those not receiving AT (the non-AT group), and were predominantly male. Estimated blood loss and operative time in the AT group (median: 50 mL and 294 min) did not differ from those in the non-AT group (median: 20 mL and 295 min). There were no intergroup differences in the frequencies of other postoperative complications and oncological outcomes. Our results at the very least can support that laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is a safe and feasible option for patients taking long-term AT discontinued perioperatively.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2019.1619583DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rectal cancer
16
laparoscopic surgery
8
surgery rectal
8
anti-thrombotic therapy
8
resection rectal
8
feasible option
8
patients receiving
8
non-at group
8
group median
8
patients
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!